{
  "id": 6137009,
  "name": "Shirley DUVALL v. Charles L. DANIELS, Director of Labor",
  "name_abbreviation": "Duvall v. Daniels",
  "decision_date": "1981-03-18",
  "docket_number": "E 80-280",
  "first_page": "50",
  "last_page": "51",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 Ark. App. 50"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "613 S.W.2d 116"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark. Ct. App.",
    "id": 13370,
    "name": "Arkansas Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 140,
    "char_count": 1587,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.796,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.138363859351185e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4724292806260133
    },
    "sha256": "7fed349ce946fd4a19e43cc7189bdd1cc7432536a5223c391be5f251fc3f025c",
    "simhash": "1:04dcd12a70a6c155",
    "word_count": 270
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:52:32.500580+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Shirley DUVALL v. Charles L. DANIELS, Director of Labor"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "James R. Cooper, Judge.\nThis is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Review affirming the Appeal Tribunal, which affirmed the Agency determination denying unemployment benefits to claimant on the finding that she was not fully available and actively seeking work and in the labor market under the provisions of Ark. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 81-1105 (c) (Repl. 1976).\nThe appellant worked as an intermittent poultry inspector and had worked at that job for five years. The testimony indicated that she was allowed to work 1,280 hours annually and no more; that she was willing to give up that job if she could find a full time job which would pay her more money per year; and that appellant wished to retain her U.S.D.A. position and draw unemployment benefits after she had worked her maximum time for the government.\nThe Board of Review held appellant disqualified from receiving benefits under Ark. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 81-1105 (c) (Repl. 1976), which required her to be \u201cavailable\u201d for work. The Board found that she was not fully available and actively seeking work and in the labor market at the time of the hearing.\nThere is substantial evidence to sustain the finding of the Board that appellant was not available to pursue a full time position elsewhere, and since the determination by the Board is supported by substantial evidence we affirm. Ark. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 81-1107 (d) (7) (Repl. 1976).\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "James R. Cooper, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Appellant, pro se.",
      "Herm Northcutt, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Shirley DUVALL v. Charles L. DANIELS, Director of Labor\nE 80-280\n613 S.W. 2d 116\nCourt of Appeals of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered March 18, 1981\nAppellant, pro se.\nHerm Northcutt, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0050-01",
  "first_page_order": 70,
  "last_page_order": 71
}