{
  "id": 6065978,
  "name": "Amanda Gail HOLT v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Holt v. State",
  "decision_date": "2008-12-31",
  "docket_number": "CA CR 08-170",
  "first_page": "197",
  "last_page": "197",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "104 Ark. App. 197"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "290 S.W.3d 20"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark. Ct. App.",
    "id": 13370,
    "name": "Arkansas Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 133,
    "char_count": 1601,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.756,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.1995933875888662e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7672670615091312
    },
    "sha256": "005e2b377476f5830a23e13387fb0556abe9225945f3b296fcec4105aed79b3f",
    "simhash": "1:e8bf79ce0edf3d79",
    "word_count": 246
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:37:35.435157+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Amanda Gail HOLT v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAmanda Gail Holt was charged with manufacture of methamphetamine, possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture, maintaining a drug premises, and three counts of exposing a child to a chemical substance. After a jury trial, she was convicted of all of the charges and sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment totaling fifty-one years. On appeal, she contends that there is no substantial evidence to support any of the findings of guilt and that the trial court erred in denying her motions for directed verdicts of acquittal. We affirm appellant\u2019s convictions for possession of paraphernalia and exposing children to a chemical substance. We reverse and dismiss her convictions for manufacture of methamphetamine and maintaining a drug premises.\nChief Judge Pittman\u2019s opinion below presents the majority opinion on the affirmance of appellant\u2019s convictions for possession of paraphernalia and exposing the children to a chemical substance. Judge Hunt\u2019s opinion contains the majority opinion on the reversal of the convictions for manufacture of methamphetamine and maintaining a drug premises.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William R. Simpson, Jr., Public Defender, Kent C. Krause, Deputy Public Defender, by: Clint Miller, Deputy Public Defender, and Misty Steele, Law Student Admitted to Practice Pursuant to Rule XV of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, for appellant.",
      "Dustin McDaniel, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Karen Virginia Wallace, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Amanda Gail HOLT v. STATE of Arkansas\nCA CR 08-170\n290 S.W.3d 20\nCourt of Appeals of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered December 31, 2008\nWilliam R. Simpson, Jr., Public Defender, Kent C. Krause, Deputy Public Defender, by: Clint Miller, Deputy Public Defender, and Misty Steele, Law Student Admitted to Practice Pursuant to Rule XV of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, for appellant.\nDustin McDaniel, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Karen Virginia Wallace, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0197-01",
  "first_page_order": 223,
  "last_page_order": 223
}