{
  "id": 6654565,
  "name": "Mary NICHOLS v. Dewey STILES, DIRECTOR OF LABOR",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nichols v. Stiles",
  "decision_date": "1984-05-09",
  "docket_number": "E 84-7",
  "first_page": "212",
  "last_page": "213",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "11 Ark. App. 212"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "668 S.W.2d 554"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark. Ct. App.",
    "id": 13370,
    "name": "Arkansas Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "269 Ark. 676",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1712390
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1980,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/269/0676-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 185,
    "char_count": 1925,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.848,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.17953305385758012
    },
    "sha256": "b6170ef8f482eddf5349d2074b5f9ac3cf9213a4982aeef617682fc68b691288",
    "simhash": "1:db3a0586a7a51ab8",
    "word_count": 325
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:16:17.677907+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Cooper and Cracraft, JJ., agree."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Mary NICHOLS v. Dewey STILES, DIRECTOR OF LABOR"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Donald L. Corbin, Judge.\nAppellant, Mary Nichols, appeals a decision of the Board of Review affirming the action of the Appeal Tribunal which affirmed an Agency determination denying benefits and reducing her base period wages pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 81-1106(a) and \u00a7 81-1104(h) (Supp. 1985). This action was predicated on the basis that appellant\u2019s appeal to the Appeal Tribunal was untimely filed pursuant to the authority of Ark. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 81-1107(d)(2) (Supp. 1983). We affirm.\nThe record reflects that appellant quit her employment with J.J.\u2019s Truck Stop on July 15, 1983, in order to get married and move with her spouse to New Mexico. The notice of the Agency determination was mailed on September 12, 1983, and appellant filed her appeal on October 17,1983. A telephone hearing was held on November 9,1983, before the Appeal Tribunal. Pursuant to Paulino v. Daniels, 269 Ark. 676, 599 S.W.2d 760 (Ark. App. 1980), appellant was afforded this opportunity to establish why the late filing was the result of circumstances beyond her control. Appellant testified that after receiving the Agency determination, she stepped up her search for work. She stated that her appeal was untimely because of this concentrated effort to secure employment. This clearly is not an acceptable defense.\nWe note that Ark. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 81-1106(a) was amended by Act 482 of 1983 to disallow benefits to a claimant who voluntarily leaves his or her last work to. accompany a spouse to a new place of residence unless he or she has done so prior to July 1,1983. Thus, it would appear that appellant would have been disqualified under this amended Act because she left her employment on July 15, 1983.\nAffirmed.\nCooper and Cracraft, JJ., agree.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Donald L. Corbin, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Appellant, pro se.",
      "Alinda Andrews, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Mary NICHOLS v. Dewey STILES, DIRECTOR OF LABOR\nE 84-7\n668 S.W.2d 554\nCourt of Appeals of Arkansas Division I\nOpinion delivered May 9, 1984\nAppellant, pro se.\nAlinda Andrews, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0212-01",
  "first_page_order": 234,
  "last_page_order": 235
}