{
  "id": 6138275,
  "name": "Nola Neher HILL, Employee v. TRAVENOL LABORATORIES, INC. Employer",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hill v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc.",
  "decision_date": "1988-05-11",
  "docket_number": "CA 87-367",
  "first_page": "116",
  "last_page": "118",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "24 Ark. App. 116"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "748 S.W.2d 356"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark. Ct. App.",
    "id": 13370,
    "name": "Arkansas Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "11 Ark. App. 161",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        6652697
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark-app/11/0161-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 11-9-711",
      "category": "laws:leg_statute",
      "reporter": "Ark. Code Ann.",
      "year": 1987,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "(b)"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 178,
    "char_count": 2311,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.91,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.770845263994211e-08,
      "percentile": 0.41331425113973824
    },
    "sha256": "1c1cd879b49bb3771d704b9ca9fd4d26b0ed08b89d6877498f0aa4acc916b716",
    "simhash": "1:6412e54660500dbd",
    "word_count": 382
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:52:21.510151+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Corbin, C.J., and Mayfield, J., agree."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Nola Neher HILL, Employee v. TRAVENOL LABORATORIES, INC. Employer"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Beth Gladden Coulson, Judge.\nAppellant, \u00d1ola Neher Hill, raises four points for reversal in this appeal from a decision of the Arkansas Workers\u2019 Compensation Commission denying her claim. We find, however, that the appeal was not filed in a timely manner as required by Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 11-9-711(b) (1987), and we therefore dismiss it.\nOn May 18,1987, the Commission filed its opinion denying appellant\u2019s claim. Appellant filed a petition for reconsideration, which the Commission, declaring it to be \u201cwithout merit,\u201d denied on July 1, 1987. On July 20, 1987, appellant filed a notice of appeal with the Commission. Although the document indicates that the appeal is from the decision of the Commission denying reconsideration on July 1,1987, the substance of her appeal is in fact concerned with the Commission\u2019s opinion dated May 18, 1987.\nThe time allotted for filing an appeal with this court from a decision by the Commission is prescribed by Ark. Code Ann. | 11-9-711(b)(1) (1987):\nA compensation order or award of the Workers\u2019 Compensation Commission shall become final unless a party to the dispute shall, within thirty (30) days from receipt by him of the order or award, file notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals, which is designated as the forum for judicial review of those orders and awards.\nIn Morrison v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 11 Ark. App. 161, 668 S. W.2d 47 (1984), we emphasized the finality of a Commission order in the absence of an appeal filed within thirty days. We also noted that the Commission has the authority to consider a motion for rehearing which is filed within the thirty days allowed for an appeal, but we stressed that \u201cthefiling of a motionfor reconsideration, or rehearing, does not extend the time to file the notice of appeal.\u201d (Emphasis added.)\nThe notice was not timely filed. The petition for reconsideration did not, as Morrison v. Tyson Foods, Inc., supra, establishes, extend the time allowed appellant for filing a notice of appeal.\nAppeal dismissed.\nCorbin, C.J., and Mayfield, J., agree.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Beth Gladden Coulson, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frederick S. \u201cRick\u201d Spencer, for appellant.",
      "Harper, Young, Smith & Maurras, by: Tom Harper, Jr., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Nola Neher HILL, Employee v. TRAVENOL LABORATORIES, INC. Employer\nCA 87-367\n748 S.W.2d 356\nCourt of Appeals of Arkansas Division I\nOpinion delivered May 11, 1988\nFrederick S. \u201cRick\u201d Spencer, for appellant.\nHarper, Young, Smith & Maurras, by: Tom Harper, Jr., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0116-01",
  "first_page_order": 136,
  "last_page_order": 138
}