{
  "id": 6137191,
  "name": "Christopher WARD v. Linda Mae Ward McCORD",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ward v. McCord",
  "decision_date": "1997-12-22",
  "docket_number": "CA 97-1122",
  "first_page": "91",
  "last_page": "92",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "60 Ark. App. 91"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "957 S.W.2d 190"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark. Ct. App.",
    "id": 13370,
    "name": "Arkansas Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "603 S.W.2d 393",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1709238
      ],
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "Per Curiam Order decided under prior rule"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/270/0003-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "264 Ark. 34",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "Per Curiam Order decided under prior rule"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 133,
    "char_count": 1460,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.757,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.17486115985912692
    },
    "sha256": "17c28717c7fd85ab995e8e77dd4966a5a3be45fafb366c4a49f1cc449ea15990",
    "simhash": "1:2198ae549760b2ca",
    "word_count": 239
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:03:53.777728+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Christopher WARD v. Linda Mae Ward McCORD"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant Christopher Ward\u2019s motion to reconsider our denial of his motion to consolidate the record is denied because it was unnecessary for him to seek permission from this court to consider the entire record in his appeal.\nThis case involves a motion by Appellee Linda Mae Ward McCord to set aside the property settlement incorporated in the parties\u2019 1986 divorce decree. This court had on March 8, 1995, dismissed Ward\u2019s prior appeal of the trial court\u2019s denial of his motion for summary judgment, CA94-1362. In his motion related to his current appeal, CA97-1122, Ward has moved to consolidate the record because the chancellor referred to the proceedings contained within the record lodged with this court for CA94-1362.\nArkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rule 4-2(a)(5) expressly states in pertinent part: \u201cOn a second or subsequent appeal, the abstract shall include a condensation of all pertinent portions of the record filed on any prior appeal.\u201d Accordingly, the appellant need not have moved for leave of this court to include in his current abstract those portions of the record filed for CA94-1362. See Marshall v. State, 264 Ark. 34-D, 603 S.W.2d 393 (1979) (Per Curiam Order decided under prior rule).\nIt is so ordered.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "James Howard Smith, for appellant.",
      "Helen Rice Grinder, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Christopher WARD v. Linda Mae Ward McCORD\nCA 97-1122\n957 S.W.2d 190\nCourt of Appeals of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered December 22, 1997\nJames Howard Smith, for appellant.\nHelen Rice Grinder, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0091-01",
  "first_page_order": 113,
  "last_page_order": 114
}