{
  "id": 6138330,
  "name": "Ricco GREER v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Greer v. State",
  "decision_date": "2002-04-17",
  "docket_number": "CA CR 01-1033",
  "first_page": "180",
  "last_page": "184",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "77 Ark. App. 180"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "72 S.W.3d 893"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark. Ct. App.",
    "id": 13370,
    "name": "Arkansas Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "319 Ark. 147",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1453559
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1994,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/319/0147-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "50 Ark. App. 185",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        6139464
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1995,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark-app/50/0185-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "299 Ark. 532",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1888353
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1989,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/299/0532-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 409",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1664827
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/265/0409-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "7 Ark. App. 38",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        6136422
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1982,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark-app/7/0038-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "54 Ark. App. 271",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        6140370
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1996,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark-app/54/0271-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "337 Ark. 239",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1241025
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1999,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/337/0239-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "223 Ark. 721",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1650262
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1954,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/223/0721-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "106 Md. App. 401",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Md. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4429246
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1995,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/md-app/106/0401-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 5-36-101",
      "category": "laws:leg_statute",
      "reporter": "Ark. Code Ann.",
      "weight": 2,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "A"
        },
        {
          "page": "(4)(A)"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 5-36-108",
      "category": "laws:leg_statute",
      "reporter": "Ark. Code Ann.",
      "year": 1997,
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 457,
    "char_count": 6191,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.738,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.676830387708631e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3555703440625303
    },
    "sha256": "298f6a2bc80537d6d808279d054934d096068c0b46a4352e95898f596b0ba385",
    "simhash": "1:8b61e542cf4d1dd8",
    "word_count": 1064
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:00:28.541561+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Hart and Neal, JJ., agree."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Ricco GREER v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "John E. Jennings, Judge.\nOn September 6, 2000, Ricco Greer took his mother\u2019s car from their home in North Little Rock without her permission. She called the police the next morning. They responded promptly and shortly found Greer and the car. Greer was charged with felony theft and, after a bench trial, was found guilty, He was sentenced as an habitual offender to a term of seven years\u2019 imprisonment.\nOn appeal, Greer\u2019s sole contention is that the court\u2019s decision is not supported by substantial evidence. He asks us to reduce his conviction to unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, a class A misdemeanor under Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 5-36-108 (Repl. 1997). We agree that the decision of the circuit court should be affirmed as modified.\nAt trial three witnesses testified for the State; the defense called no witnesses. Appellant\u2019s mother, Delores Adkins, testified that she was at home on September 6, 2000, with another son, who was disabled. She went into the bathroom, having left the keys to her Oldsmobile on a table. When she came out, the keys to the car and the car itself were gone. She testified that she knew Greer had taken it because \u201che is the only one [who was] messing with the car.\u201d The next day she phoned the police to report her car had been stolen.\nMrs. Adkins testified that her son, Ricco Greer, lived with her at her house; that she let him drive her car \u201cevery now and then\u201d; that he did not have permission to drive her car that day; that he knew he could not use that particular car because her daughter used it to go to work; and that she has a \u201chabit\u201d of calling the police if he does not return her car \u201con time.\u201d She said, \u201cHe just likes to go joy-ride.\u201d\nNorth Little Rock police officer John Gravett testified that Mrs. Adkins told him her son had stolen her car. He immediately went to the Eastgate housing area and found the car. Mrs. Adkins then arrived and told Gravett she had seen Greer running toward their North Little Rock home. He was quickly apprehended.\nBill Elizandro, another officer, testified that he read Greer his Miranda rights. Officer Gravett then testified that Greer admitted to having taken the car and driven it.\nArkansas Code Annotated section 5-36-103(a)(l) provides:\n(a) A person commits theft of property if he:\n(1) Knowingly takes or exercises unauthorized control over, or makes an unauthorized transfer of an interest in, the property of another person, with the purpose of depriving the owner thereof;\nThe word \u201cdeprive\u201d is defined at Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 5-36-101 (4) (A) as \u201cto withhold property or to cause it to be withheld either permanently or under circumstances such that a major part of its economic value, use, or benefit is appropriated to the actor or lost to the owner.\u201d\nArkansas Code Annotated \u00a7 5-36-108 provides that \u201ca person commits unauthorized use of a vehicle if he knowingly takes, operates, or exercises control over another person\u2019s vehicle without consent of the owner.\u201d Unauthorized use is a class A misdemeanor. Historically, the \u201cunauthorized use\u201d statutes were passed to deal with the problem of \u201cjoy-riding,\u201d a phenomenon that apparently arose in the 1940\u2019s. See In re Lakeysha P., 106 Md. App. 401, 665 A.2d 264 (1995). See also Sullivant v. Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co., 223 Ark. 721, 268 S.W.2d 372 (1954).\nWhen the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged in a criminal case, we affirm if the verdict of the court or jury is supported by substantial evidence. The test is whether the evidence is \u201cof sufficient force and character to compel reasonable minds to reach a conclusion beyond suspicion and conjecture.\u201d Smith v. State, 337 Ark. 239, 988 S.W.2d 492 (1999).\nWe defer to the trier of fact, here the circuit court, on questions of fact and, more specifically, on issues of the credibility of the witnesses. Even if the evidence is undisputed, as it is here, we defer to the trial court if different inferences might reasonably be drawn from the testimony of the witnesses. Williams v. State, 54 Ark. App. 271, 927 S.W.2d 812 (1996); Lewis v. State, 7 Ark. App. 38, 644 S.W.2d 303 (1982); Core v. State, 265 Ark. 409, 578 S.W.2d 581 (1979).\nAppellant\u2019s argument is that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to show that he intended to \u201cdeprive\u201d his mother of her car within the meaning of the statute. Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-36-101(4)(A) states that \u201cdeprive\u201d means \u201cto withhold . . . permanently.\u201d Her testimony alone rebuts the State\u2019s contention that the defendant committed felony theft.\nWe acknowledge the decisions in Moore v. State, 299 Ark. 532, 773 S.W.2d 834 (1989) and Hickson v. State, 50 Ark. App. 185, 901 S.W.2d 868 (1995), both saying that the theft statute \u201cmakes no exceptions for temporary deprivation.\u201d We can only assume that in neither case did the defendant argue the definition of \u201cdeprive\u201d as set forth in Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 5-36-101(4)(A). We hold that on these facts the trial court\u2019s judgment was not supported by substantial evidence.\nThe only remaining question is the proper disposition of the appeal:\n[W]here the evidence presented is insufficient to sustain a conviction for a certain crime, but where there is sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction for a lesser included offense of that crime, this court may \u201creduce the punishment to the maximum for the lesser offense, reduce it to the minimum for the lesser offense, fix it ... at some intermediate point, remand the case to the trial court of the assessment of the penalty, or grant a new trial either absolutely or conditionally.\nTigue v. State, 319 Ark. 147, 889 S.W.2d 760 (1994).\nWe agree with appellant that his conviction should be reduced to unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, a class A misdemeanor, and set his punishment at one year in the Pulaski County Jail.\nAffirmed as modified.\nHart and Neal, JJ., agree.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "John E. Jennings, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William R. Simpson, Jr., Public Defender; Sandra S. Cordi, Deputy Public Defender; by: Deborah R. Sailings, Deputy Public Defender, for appellant.",
      "Mark Pryor, Att\u2019y Gen., by: David J. Davies, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Ricco GREER v. STATE of Arkansas\nCA CR 01-1033\n72 S.W.3d 893\nCourt of Appeals of Arkansas Division III\nOpinion delivered April 17, 2002\nWilliam R. Simpson, Jr., Public Defender; Sandra S. Cordi, Deputy Public Defender; by: Deborah R. Sailings, Deputy Public Defender, for appellant.\nMark Pryor, Att\u2019y Gen., by: David J. Davies, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0180-01",
  "first_page_order": 200,
  "last_page_order": 204
}