{
  "id": 236553,
  "name": "The United States vs. Robert Crittenden",
  "name_abbreviation": "United States v. Crittenden",
  "decision_date": "1828-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "61",
  "last_page": "61",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 Ark. Terr. Rep. 61"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 9132,
    "name": "Superior Court of the Territory of Arkansas"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 77,
    "char_count": 860,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.488,
    "sha256": "222715ddf5152085648f3698603e6d8d55fb44ec1c82bfe33beb13e091276415",
    "simhash": "1:d0815cea1b3ff1fa",
    "word_count": 138
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:05:42.619619+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The United States vs. Robert Crittenden."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion oe the Court. \u2014 The defendant moved the court to quash the indictment, because the time therein stated was in the alternative \u201c on or about,\u201d and because the indictment does-not conclude \u201cagainst the peace and dignity of the United States;\u201d and the parties being heard, and full consideration thereof had, it is the opinion of the court that for either of the objections the indictment should be quashed.\nIndictment quashed, and defendant discharged.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The United States vs. Robert Crittenden.\n1. Indictment is quashable in which the time is alleged \u201con or about\u201d such a day.\n2. It is also quashable for failing to conclude \u201c against the peace and dignity of the United States.\u201d\nOctober, 1828.\n\u2014 Indictment for sending a challenge to fight a duel, determined before Benjamin Johnson, Thomas P. Eskridge, James Woodson Bates, and William Trimble, judges."
  },
  "file_name": "0061-02",
  "first_page_order": 77,
  "last_page_order": 77
}
