{
  "id": 236682,
  "name": "Hewes Scull vs. Joseph Kuykendall",
  "name_abbreviation": "Scull v. Kuykendall",
  "decision_date": "1821-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "9",
  "last_page": "9",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 Ark. Terr. Rep. 9"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 9132,
    "name": "Superior Court of the Territory of Arkansas"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 82,
    "char_count": 874,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.538,
    "sha256": "fc6c0263760e40cd179715b5acbe359d14bb18c5a3bd258130e02a56d85ede08",
    "simhash": "1:9866b4c49092a986",
    "word_count": 151
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:05:42.619619+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Hewes Scull vs. Joseph Kuykendall."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion oe the Court. \u2014 The court below dismissed this suit because there was an error in the original writ, although it was not served, but an alias had been regularly obtained and served on the defendant. We can see no reason for dismissing the suit for an error in a writ which was never served. It can only be considered as a clerical misprision, by which the defendant could not possibly be prejudiced. The alias capias which was served on the defendant is in every respect correct, and the court ought not to have looked beyond it. Reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Hewes Scull vs. Joseph Kuykendall.\nA suit should not be dismissed because a capias not served was erroneous when an alias capias executed on the defendant is correct; as the court should not look beyond the last writ.\nJune, 1821.\n\u2014 Error to Arkansas Circuit Court, determined before Benjamin Johnson and Andrew Scott, judges."
  },
  "file_name": "0009-01",
  "first_page_order": 25,
  "last_page_order": 25
}
