{
  "id": 8728294,
  "name": "Jeffery against Marshall",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jeffery v. Marshall",
  "decision_date": "1838-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "47",
  "last_page": "47",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 Ark. 47"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 100,
    "char_count": 1297,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.468,
    "sha256": "0095eea796e162066d514740fbdb9df58427f9060dd66e599de89e806c9362c0",
    "simhash": "1:798361890d61b4fe",
    "word_count": 211
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:13:03.293086+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Jeffery against Marshall."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Dickinson, Judge,\ndelivered the opinion of the court: The appellant in this case prayed an appeal from the Lawrence Circuit Court, which was granted; and thereupon William F. Denton and James Pope, acknowledged themselves justly bound with the plaintiff in the sum of One Hundred Dollars, \u201c/or the prosecution thereof..\u201d\nThe appellee moves to dismiss this case upon the ground that the recognizance is not sufficient. The statute requires that the plaintiff, if he appeal, shall enter into a recognizance with one or more sufficient sureties, in a sum sufficient to cover the costs in the Circuit Court and the costs of such appeal, conditioned that he will pay the costs in case the judgment of the Circuit Court shall be confirmed by the Supreme Court. See Digest, page 334.\nIt is evident that the recognizance given by the appellant in this case is not in conformity with the statute, for it contains no condition whatever. Therefore the motion to dismiss must be sustained,\nAppeal dismissed, with costs.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Dickinson, Judge,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Haggard and Taylor, for the motion.",
      "Fowler, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Jeffery against Marshall.\nAppeal from Lawrence Circuit Court.\nA recognizance in appeal, conditioned \u201cfor the prosecution of the appeal,\u201di* not sufficient-\nThe appellee moved to dismiss this appeal, for want of a sufficient recognizance.\nHaggard and Taylor, for the motion.\nFowler, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0047-01",
  "first_page_order": 51,
  "last_page_order": 51
}