{
  "id": 1342254,
  "name": "Miller v. White",
  "name_abbreviation": "Miller v. White",
  "decision_date": "1913-05-26",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "253",
  "last_page": "254",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "108 Ark. 253"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "105 Ark. 110",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1347110
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/105/0110-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 156,
    "char_count": 2223,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.516,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.9859951819553831e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7411688866802659
    },
    "sha256": "80642d4625a3f9f6fc462ff9413efe7dd22784d887c03fd076a2ce2f9cd32484",
    "simhash": "1:c3add3b15eb7427c",
    "word_count": 374
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:21:43.572457+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Miller v. White."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Kirby, J.\nThis suit was brought by the improvement district to enforce the collection of assessments on the property of Mrs. Susie Miller, for grading and improving the streets of the town of Pulaski Heights.\nIt will not be necessary to discuss any of the questions raised by appellant, since her appeal must be dismissed upon appellees\u2019 motion.\nIt appears that the decree from which the appeal was taken was rendered on February 5, 1913, and that the transcript of the record was not filed in the office of the clerk of this court until April 8, 1913, more than thirty days thereafter. It is the purpose of the law to avoid delay, and it provides for great dispatch in the enforcement of the collection of assessments for improvements. It requires that when an appeal is taken from a decree in favor of the board for the condemnation and sale of the land to pay the assessments that the transcript shall be filed in the office of the clerk of the Supreme Court within twenty days after the rendition of the decree appealed from. (Sec. 5706, Kirby\u2019s Digest.) And, \u201cNo appeal shall be prosecuted from any decree after the expiration of the twenty days herein granted for filing the transcript in the clerk\u2019s office of the Supreme Court.\u201d (Sec. 5709, Kirby\u2019s Digest.)\nThese provisions of the statute are plain and mandatory, and, not having been complied with, and the transcript of the record lodged with the clerk of the Supreme Court within the time required, the appeal must be dismissed. Crandall v. Harrison, 105 Ark. 110.\nIt is so ordered.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Kirby, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Carmichael, Brooks, Powers & Rector, for appellant.",
      "Terry, Doivnie \u00e9 Streepey, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Miller v. White.\nOpinion delivered May 26, 1913.\nMunicipal corporations \u2014 street improvements \u2014 time op appeal. \u2014 The provisions of Kirby\u2019s Digest, \u00a7 5706, that the transcript on appeal from a decree for street improvement asessments shall be filed within twenty days after the rendition of the decree appealed from, and \u00a7 5709, that no appeal shall be prosecuted after the expiration of the twenty days, are mandatory, and when a transcript has not been filed on time the appeal must be dismissed.\nAppeal from Pulaski Chancery Court; Johm E. Martineau, Chancellor;\nappeal dismissed.\nCarmichael, Brooks, Powers & Rector, for appellant.\nTerry, Doivnie \u00e9 Streepey, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0253-01",
  "first_page_order": 273,
  "last_page_order": 274
}