{
  "id": 8727872,
  "name": "Scoggin et al. vs. The State",
  "name_abbreviation": "Scoggin v. State",
  "decision_date": "1851-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "504",
  "last_page": "504",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "11 Ark. 504"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 48,
    "char_count": 467,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.593,
    "sha256": "1fffb82e425b1773480b14c2fb285262402d48e25c8ce682404130d43663232b",
    "simhash": "1:7bcacdb528ab8d71",
    "word_count": 82
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:09:57.742091+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Scoggin et al. vs. The State."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Scott, J.\nThe question that is decisive of this case was settled in the case of Eason vs. The State. The judgment of the circuit court must be reversed and this cause remanded with instructions to dismiss the appeal from the justice for want of jurisdiction.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Scott, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Scoggin et al. vs. The State.\nNote. \u2014 Kerr vs. The State, and Collins vs. The State, were affirmed, and Blake-ney vs. State, and Want vs. State reversed under the decision in Eason vs. The State. \u2014 Reporter."
  },
  "file_name": "0504-01",
  "first_page_order": 504,
  "last_page_order": 504
}