{
  "id": 1337088,
  "name": "Reisinger v. Johnson",
  "name_abbreviation": "Reisinger v. Johnson",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "7",
  "last_page": "8",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "110 Ark. 7"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "101 Ark. 207",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1311104
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/101/0207-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 106,
    "char_count": 1081,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.456,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.818696153796127e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7188969318288441
    },
    "sha256": "93be56658e5847fb6bb5064ae9a45667aec1026bd7f93139365e0d441cd64473",
    "simhash": "1:a9b0470e32f4982a",
    "word_count": 186
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:48:34.663007+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Reisinger v. Johnson."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Kirby, J.\nReisinger brought suit in unlawful detainer against Johnson, and, from the judgment in favor of the defendant, appealed.\nThe cause of action grew out of the alleged failure of the defendant to comply with the terms of a lease, which was filed as an exhibit to the complaint. \u25a0\nAppellant has not favored this court with an abstract of the pleadings, nor the lease, and, not having been furnished the means for an intelligent consideration and review of the case by an abstract, as required by rule 9, the court, necessarily, can not pass upon the merits without exploring the transcript, which \u201cit can not be expected to and will not do,\u201d as said in Files v. Tebbs, 101 Ark. 207, and the judgment must be affirmed.\nIt is so ordered.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Kirby, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "L. P. Berry, for appellant.",
      "Appellee pro se."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Reisinger v. Johnson.\nOpinion delivered October 27, 1913.\nAppeal and error\u2014failure to abstract record.\u2014Where appellant failed to abstract the record as required by rule 9 of the Supreme Court, the judgment will be affirmed.\nAppeal from Crittenden Circuit Court; J. F. Gautney, Judge;\naffirmed.\nL. P. Berry, for appellant.\nAppellee pro se."
  },
  "file_name": "0007-01",
  "first_page_order": 25,
  "last_page_order": 26
}