{
  "id": 1337057,
  "name": "Buckley v. Collins",
  "name_abbreviation": "Buckley v. Collins",
  "decision_date": "1913-12-15",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "479",
  "last_page": "480",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "110 Ark. 479"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "70 Ark. 430",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "92 Ark. 521",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "31 S. W. 740",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "78 Ark. 208",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "44 Ark. 482",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1893437
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/44/0482-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "45 Ark. 456",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1892040
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/45/0456-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "78 Ark. 207",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1497257
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/78/0207-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 146,
    "char_count": 1674,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.564,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.05047977700630423
    },
    "sha256": "82c5c4fa51be5b9c7f159d472caef20b6058aa15eddb580925a2e63e5816afa2",
    "simhash": "1:18f48575c8efc463",
    "word_count": 297
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:48:34.663007+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Buckley v. Collins."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": ",. 'Wood, J.,\n(after stating the facts). Every litigant has the right of appeal from an adverse judgment, no matter how small the amount thereof may be. Constitution-of Arkansas, art. 7, \u00a7 42; Kirby\u2019s Digest, \u00a7 4665; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Langley, 78 Ark. 207; see also Brown v. Higgins, 45 Ark. 456; Townsend v. Timmons, 44 Ark. 482.\nReversed and remanded with directions to reinstate the appeal from the justice court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": ",. 'Wood, J.,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "0. A. Featherston, for appellant.",
      "W. T. Kidd, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Buckley v. Collins.\nOpinion delivered December 15, 1913.\nAppeal\u2014judgment of justice of the peace.\u2014Every litigant lias the right of appeal from an adverse judgment, no matter how small the amount thereof may he, and it is error for the circuit court to dismiss an appeal \u201con the ground that the amount involved is too small for the consideration of the court.\u201d\nAppeal from Pike Circuit Court; Jeff T. Cowling, Judge;\nreversed.\nSTATEMENT BY THE COURT.\nJudgment was rendered against appellant in the justice court for the sum of $4.95, and he appealed to the circuit court. The circuit court dismissed the appeal \u2018 \u2018 on the ground that the amount involved is too small for the' consideration of the court,\u201d and appellant appeals to this court.\n0. A. Featherston, for appellant.\n1. A litigant has the right to appeal from any judgment, however small. Const. 1874, art. 2, \u00a7 13; Kirby\u2019s Dig., \u00a7 4671; 78 Ark. 208; 44 Id. 482; 45 Id. 456.\n2. No motion for a new trial necessary. 31 S. W. 740.\nW. T. Kidd, for appellee.\n1. A motion for new trial for newly discovered evidence must be. supported by affidavit. Kirby\u2019s Dig., \u00a7 6219; 92 Ark. 521.\n2. Moving for a new trial waives all exceptions not in the motion. 1 Crawford\u2019s Dig., p. 122; 70 Ark. 430."
  },
  "file_name": "0479-01",
  "first_page_order": 497,
  "last_page_order": 498
}