{
  "id": 1562523,
  "name": "Yowell v. Fort Smith Pure Milk Company",
  "name_abbreviation": "Yowell v. Fort Smith Pure Milk Co.",
  "decision_date": "1915-05-17",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "448",
  "last_page": "448",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "118 Ark. 448"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "101 Ark. 90",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1310964
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/101/0090-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1293,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.454,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3651623038527203e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6371193841803132
    },
    "sha256": "cc9bb18abd2dfcd0ccc13a7bf01a07667abb94c2366578f2719ea2a60cf02da5",
    "simhash": "1:dce8326dfc0f9c6e",
    "word_count": 220
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:53:29.321926+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Yowell v. Fort Smith Pure Milk Company."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Wood; J.\nThis appeal is prosecuted from an order of the circuit court sustaining a motion for a new trial on behalf of appellee who was the defendant below. Appellant attempts to appeal from an order of the trial court granting appellee a new trial.\nSection 1188' of Kirby\u2019s Digest provides, in part: # * * \u201cBut no appeal to the Supreme Court from an order granting a new trial, in a case made or, bill of exceptions, shall be effectual for any .purpose unless the notice of appeal contains an .assent on the part of the appellant that, if the order be affirmed judgment absolute shall be rendered against the appellant.\u201d\n. The appellant does not show that he has complied with this statute, therefore his attempted appeal can not avail him. See, St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Hix, 101 Ark. 90.\nThe appeal is therefore dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Wood; J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Holland & Holland, for appellant.",
      "H. C. Mechem, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Yowell v. Fort Smith Pure Milk Company.\nOpinion delivered May 17, 1915.\nAPPPEAI. AND ERROR \u2014 APPEAL PROM ORDER GRANTING A NEW TRIAL. \u2014 An appeal from an order granting a new 'ferial in (the circuit court, will ibe dismissed when the .appellant has not complied with the statute, Kirby\u2019s Digest, \u00a7 1188.\nAppeal from Sebastian Circuit Court, Fort Smith District; Daniel Hon, Judge;\nappeal dismissed.\nHolland & Holland, for appellant.\nH. C. Mechem, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0448-01",
  "first_page_order": 470,
  "last_page_order": 470
}