{
  "id": 8728034,
  "name": "Rogers vs. the State",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rogers v. State",
  "decision_date": "1854-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "71",
  "last_page": "71",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "15 Ark. 71"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 60,
    "char_count": 512,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.394,
    "sha256": "d8e878317d17a101667862800121a1b197830ac44105eee6d1ecead8a04119bb",
    "simhash": "1:6ad514a41ea38d11",
    "word_count": 84
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:05:00.270239+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Rogers vs. the State."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice \"WatkiNS\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThe appellant was convicted in the Mayor\u2019s Court of Fort Smith, upon an indictment for keeping a gaming house. The only question argued is that decided in Rutzell vs. The State; and though the proceedings appear to have been, in some respects, informal, no substantial ground is presented by the other errors assigned for reversing the conviction for a 'mere misdemeanor. Affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice \"WatkiNS"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Rogers vs. the State.\nAppeal from the Mayor\u2019s Court of Fort Smith."
  },
  "file_name": "0071-01",
  "first_page_order": 71,
  "last_page_order": 71
}