{
  "id": 1379867,
  "name": "McClain v. State",
  "name_abbreviation": "McClain v. State",
  "decision_date": "1924-06-23",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "48",
  "last_page": "49",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "165 Ark. 48"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "125 Ark. 4",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1553233
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/125/0004-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "94 Ark. 198",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1545443
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/94/0198-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "88 Ark. 290",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1517106
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/88/0290-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 174,
    "char_count": 2509,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.534,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0999468993929432e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7616706611080414
    },
    "sha256": "0b228e3c53d485a78d4aaad2ad25f8505bea30bbd7a6430120af24c05dbbc03a",
    "simhash": "1:00ab93ec9caead7d",
    "word_count": 437
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:02:20.871856+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "McClain v. State."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "McCulloch, C. J.\nAppellant was indicted for felony, and entered a plea of guilty, which the court accepted and upon which the court entered judgment. The judgment entered recites that appellant appeared in person as well as by attorney, and waived arraignment, and entered a plea of guilty. After the entry of the judgment and on the same day appellant, through another attorney, filed his petition praying that the court set aside the judgment and permit him to withdraw his plea of guilty and to enter a plea of not guilty. In the petition it was alleged that appellant was not guilty of the charge against him, and that, in the absence of his attorney, he was \u201cunduly influenced and persuaded to enter a plea of guilty.\u201d On a later day of the term the court heard the petition and entered an order overruling it, from which order and judgment an appeal has been prosecuted to this court.\nThere was no motion for a new trial filed nor bill of exceptions taken in the case \u2014 nothing appears in the record save the papers on file and the record entries.\nThere is a statute (Crawford & Moses\u2019 Digest, \u00a7 3076) which provides that the court may, at any time before judgment, permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn and a plea of not guilty substituted. It has often been held by this court that permission to withdraw a plea of guilty previously entered is a matter that rests in the sound discretion of the trial court. Greene v. State, 88 Ark. 290; Joiner v. State, 94 Ark. 198; Duncan v. State, 125 Ark. 4. There is no statute on the subject of withdrawal of pleas after rendition of judgment, but the court has the power to set aside its judgment at any time before the expiration of the term. There is nothing to show that the court abused its discretion, and we must indulge every presumption in favor of the court\u2019s proper exercise of its discretion.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "McCulloch, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. S. Utley, Attorney General, and John L. Garter, Assistant, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "McClain v. State.\nOpinion delivered June 23, 1924.\n1. Criminal law \u2014 plea of guilty \u2014 withdrawal.\u2014Permission to withdraw a plea of guilty, previously entered, is a matter that rests in the sound discretion of the trial court, under Crawford & Moses\u2019 Dig., \u00a7 3076.\n2. Criminal law \u2014 exercise of discretion \u2014 presumption.\u2014Where the court denied a petition to withdraw a plea of guilty, every presumption must be indulged in favor of the court\u2019s proper exercise of its discretion.\nAppeal from .Sebastian Circuit Court, Greenwood District; John E. Tatum, Judge;\naffirmed.\nJ. S. Utley, Attorney General, and John L. Garter, Assistant, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0048-01",
  "first_page_order": 72,
  "last_page_order": 73
}