{
  "id": 8725987,
  "name": "Johnson v. Tucker Lake Levee and Drainage District",
  "name_abbreviation": "Johnson v. Tucker Lake Levee & Drainage District",
  "decision_date": "1925-05-18",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "889",
  "last_page": "891",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "168 Ark. 889"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "92 Ark. 211",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1548594
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/92/0211-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 305,
    "char_count": 5088,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.472,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20860096476667173
    },
    "sha256": "1085655aa4e5fa48e6719d697577f88898e37accbc148d1787cd4653e21ce4a5",
    "simhash": "1:c44192c985f76fc3",
    "word_count": 860
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:11:28.689459+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Johnson v. Tucker Lake Levee and Drainage District."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Wood, J.\nThe Tucker Lake Levee & Drainage District is an improvement district organized under subdivision 2 of chapter 51 of Crawford & Moses\u2019 Digest and amendatory acts. The district lies wholly within Jefferson County, Arkansas. The commissioners of the district assessed the benefits and deposited the same with the county clerk of Jefferson County. The county clerk gave notice of that fact by publication two weeks in the Graphic, a newspaper published in Jefferson County and having a bona fide circulation therein. The paper was published every day in the week,' except Monday. It is what is termed a daily newspaper. It was not published as a weekly newspaper. The notice of the filing of the assessment by the commissioners was published in the Graphic on July 17 and again on July 24, 1924. It called on all owners of property in the district to appear before the county court on the 12th of August, iy24, to show cause, if any, against the assessment of any of the lands in the district. The county court, in pursuance of the notice, confirmed the assessment.\nThis action was brought by Cyrus Johnson and Pinckney Johnson against the district and its commissioners. The issue raised by the pleadings is whether or not the assessment was void because of insufficient publication. The trial court held that the publication of the_noti.ce in the Graphic by two consecutive weekly insertiorEs therein, as above set forth, was sufficient compliance with the statute, and entered a decree dismissing the complaint for want of equity, from which is this appeal.\nSection 3615 of Crawford & Moses\u2019 Digest, pursuant to which the notice was given, provides as follows: \u201cWhen their assessment is completed, the commissioners shall subscribe said assessment and deposit it with the county clerk, where it shall be kept and preserved as- a public record. Upon the filing of said assessment the county clerk shall give notice of the fact by publication two weeks in some weekly newspaper issued in each of the counties in which the lands of the district may lie.\u201d The term \u201cweekly\u201d means once a week. 40 Cyc. 877; Webster\u2019s International Dictionary. In the nomenclature of newspaperdom the term \u201cweekly newspaper\u201d conveys the idea that the paper is published once a week (Iowa State Savings Bank v. Jacobson, 8 So. Dakota, 292, 300), and a bi-weekly newspaper is one published every two weeks. Byrne v. Less, 92 Ark. 211.\nThe Tucker Lake Levee and Drainage District was formed under a general law. C. 51, C. & M. Digest, supra, subdiv. 2. The lawmakers bad in view condi tions that might obtain in any county or in any number of counties where it might become necessary to form drainage districts, and the term \u201cweekly newspaper\u2019\u2019 in tie statute was not used in any narrow or technical sense, but was intended to cover the conditions that would likely prevail generally throughout the State, and did not have reference to the situation in any particular locality. The framers of the law doubtless knew that weekly newspapers were published in most of the counties in the State, and they were framing the law to meet the general situation. The purpose was to provide a method for publication that would most effectually bring home to the landowners the notice of the assessment, and it was determined that the. weekly newspaper would afford the best medium, hence it was designated. But, if a paper is published two weeks in succession consecutively on Thursday of each week, it is a weekly publication of such paper, and' it \u2019 is n\u00f3ne the less a weekly publication because it is also published, not only on Thursday, but on, every other day in the week except Monday. There would certainly be as great probability of the landowners in the territory affected receiving notice of the assessment where the publication was made in a daily paper which has a general circulation as there would be if the same were published in a newspaper published once every week, or, in a weekly newspaper. It occurs to us that it would be \u201csticking in the bark\u201d to hold that the publication under review did not meet the requirements of the law for the publication of the notice of the assessment. \"We therefore conclude that the publication of the notice of the filing of the assessment with the county clerk of Jefferson County by an insertion in the Graphic for two weeks in succession on July 17 and 24, 1924, was in compliance with the statute in such cases made and provided.\nThe decree of the chancery court is correct, and it is therefore affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Wood, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "F. G. Bridges, for appellant.",
      "Palmer Danaher and M. Danaher, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Johnson v. Tucker Lake Levee and Drainage District.\nOpinion delivered May 18, 1925.\nDrains \u2014 publication of notice of assessment in weekly newspaper. \u2014 Crawford & Moses\u2019 Digest, \u00a7 3615, requiring publication of a .notice of hearing of the assessment in -a drainage district for two weeks in some weekly newspaper, is complied with by publishing such, notice once a week for two weeks in a daily newspaper.\nAppeal from Jefferson Chancery Court; H. R. Lucas, Chancellor;\naffirmed.\nF. G. Bridges, for appellant.\nPalmer Danaher and M. Danaher, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0889-01",
  "first_page_order": 907,
  "last_page_order": 909
}