{
  "id": 8726129,
  "name": "Barkeloo et al. vs. Miller",
  "name_abbreviation": "Barkeloo v. Miller",
  "decision_date": "1857-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "297",
  "last_page": "297",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "18 Ark. 297"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 39,
    "char_count": 323,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.566,
    "sha256": "acd0933374c03a1826b1e6c406f5e6b66c62ffef49694cba24010cfd8d1214b0",
    "simhash": "1:1a25cf90d133a7c9",
    "word_count": 58
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:23:25.052204+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Barkeloo et al. vs. Miller."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Scott:\nThis was a sci. fa. to revive a judgment on a forthcoming bond. The case is the counterpart of that of Miller vs. Barke-loo, just decided, where the judgment that was revived in this case was held to have been annulled.\nThe judgment in this case must, therefore, be reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Scott:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Barkeloo et al. vs. Miller."
  },
  "file_name": "0297-01",
  "first_page_order": 297,
  "last_page_order": 297
}