{
  "id": 8726190,
  "name": "Sessions et al. vs. Peay, Rec'r",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sessions v. Peay",
  "decision_date": "1857-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "270",
  "last_page": "270",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "19 Ark. 270"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 41,
    "char_count": 273,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.572,
    "sha256": "e7417a61dbb9fc40c4f4fd28095cd49e25fb59213eb370a108cae9139fa33619",
    "simhash": "1:4205c4df36170faa",
    "word_count": 49
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:38:03.385026+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Sessions et al. vs. Peay, Rec\u2019r."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Scott\ndelivered tbe opinion of the Court.\nThis case is like that of Daniel H. Sessions vs. Gordon N. Peay, Rec'r, etc., in all matters material to the questions raised.\nThe judgment will be affirmed, with four percent, damages.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Scott"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Sessions et al. vs. Peay, Rec\u2019r."
  },
  "file_name": "0270-01",
  "first_page_order": 270,
  "last_page_order": 270
}