{
  "id": 1415112,
  "name": "State v. Boatright",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Boatright",
  "decision_date": "1936-09-28",
  "docket_number": "Crim. 4009",
  "first_page": "1100",
  "last_page": "1102",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "192 Ark. 1100"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "294 S. W. 66",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "173 Ark. 1071",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8725770
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/173/1071-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "196 S. W. 922",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "130 Ark. 90",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8717958
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/130/0090-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "257 S. W. 61",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "161 Ark. 453",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1388544
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/161/0453-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "220 S. W. 814",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "143 Ark. 439",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1589368
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/143/0439-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "255 S. W. 304",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "160 Ark. 580",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8724355
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/160/0580-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "126 S. W. 1057",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "94 Ark. 368",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1545449
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/94/0368-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 213,
    "char_count": 2249,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.5,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.053140356831614506
    },
    "sha256": "2f4a7be21123c4d1bf627e4f6f4fbd17ac9cd854e275c574eb2c76175927d797",
    "simhash": "1:d373f6e306d1a4fc",
    "word_count": 412
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:15:38.173054+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Boatright."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "McHaney, J.\nAppellee was indicted charged with defrauding the Valley Bank of Hindsville of a large sum' of money, a felony. He was tried upon said charge and at the conclusion of the state\u2019s testimony, the court, on motion of appellee that there was a fatal variance between the allegations of the indictment and the proof in that indictment alleged he defrauded the bank of \u201cgold, silver and paper money,\u201d whereas the proof showed he received from the bank its draft on its correspondent bank in St. Louis, which he cashed the same day, instructed the jury to return a verdict for appellee, which was done.\nThe state has appealed under the provisions of \u00a7\u00a7 3410 and 3411, Crawford & Moses\u2019 Digest. Since appellee was acquitted of the charge, it being a charge punishable by imprisonment, we cannot reverse the case. Section 3412, Crawford & Moses\u2019 Digest; art. 2, \u00a7 8, Const. 1874; State v. Smith, 94 Ark. 368, 126 S. W. 1057; State v. Gray, 160 Ark. 580, 255 S. W. 304.\nWe have examined the record and it fails to show that any final judgment was ever entered on the verdict discharging appellee. The record shows the verdict of the jury and that an appeal was prayed and granted, but there is no record of a judgment. There is therefore nothing from which the state might appeal, and nothing -for this court to affirm, reverse or modify. It has been many times held that an appeal will be dismissed for want of a final judgment. See cases cited in Crawford\u2019s Digest under Appeal and Error, \u00a7 22, vol. 1, p. 130.\nWhat we have said must not be construed, in any manner, to approve the action of the trial court in instructing a verdict for appellee. On the contrary, we are of the opinion the court fell into error. There is no variance. Appellee received a draft on which he got the monev. See Kent v. State, 143 Ark. 439, 220 S. W. 814; Hall v. State, 161 Ark. 453, 257 S. W. 61; Cook v. State, 130 Ark. 90, 196 S. W. 922; Spears v. State, 173 Ark. 1071, 294 S. W. 66.\nLet the appeal he dismissed for want of a final judgment in the record.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "McHaney, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Carl E. Bailey, Attorney General, and J. F. Koone, Assistant, for appellant.",
      "G. T. Sullins, W. N. Ivie and Charles I vie, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Boatright.\nCrim. 4009\nOpinion delivered September 28, 1936.\nCarl E. Bailey, Attorney General, and J. F. Koone, Assistant, for appellant.\nG. T. Sullins, W. N. Ivie and Charles I vie, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "1100-01",
  "first_page_order": 1120,
  "last_page_order": 1122
}