{
  "id": 8722284,
  "name": "Shofner, Administrator v. Jones",
  "name_abbreviation": "Shofner v. Jones",
  "decision_date": "1940-12-09",
  "docket_number": "4-6072",
  "first_page": "540",
  "last_page": "542",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 Ark. 540"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "145 S.W.2d 350"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "3 S. W. 27",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "48 Ark. 277",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1887723
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/48/0277-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "84 S. W. 485",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "73 Ark. 440",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1503961
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/73/0440-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "143 S. W. 1081",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "102 Ark. 114",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1353981
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/102/0114-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "60 S. W. 235",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "68 Ark. 492",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1334142
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/68/0492-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "41 Ark. 104",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1896225
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/41/0104-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "27 Ark. 637",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1885712
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/27/0637-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "14 Ark. 244",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1862657
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/14/0244-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "5 Ark. 705",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8727935
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/5/0705-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "5 Ark. 468",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8727575
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/5/0468-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "35 Ark. 205",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1873855
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/35/0205-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "13 Ark. 507",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8728259
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/13/0507-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "33 Ark. 575",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8725323
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/33/0575-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "14 Ark. 122",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1862700
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/14/0122-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "16 Ark. 474",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8725435
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/16/0474-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "66 S. W. 346",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "70 Ark. 88",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1509492
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/70/0088-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "45 S. W. 2d 36",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "184 Ark. 900",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1438632
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/184/0900-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "33 Ark. 788",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8726318
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/33/0788-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 310,
    "char_count": 3255,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.575,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.220075443926233e-08,
      "percentile": 0.510190941634049
    },
    "sha256": "46ea9d4a8da8b0f06572ac5b9924d7a985ac9d86ba8f2ec294ccf545628a7e45",
    "simhash": "1:51ab7e94f17a7441",
    "word_count": 568
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:44:11.265597+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Shofner, Administrator v. Jones."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Grieein Smith, C. J.\nAppellees are physicians who rendered professional services to their patient, Dalhoff, who died in 1934. The administrator\u2019s approval of claims was followed by the probate court\u2019s order of allowance. Because principal assets consisted of real estate for which there was not a satisfactory market, payment was delayed.\nIn June, 1938, Jones received $208.25. The remainder of his claim was paid in September, 1939, when Compton was also paid in full. Thereafter it was insisted in- and \u201cpaid in full\u201d have reference to face values, exclusive of interest. terest was due from date of allowance by the court in 1936. There was a finding for each claimant and the administrator has appealed.\nSection 1 of act 78, approved March 21, 1893, provides that creditors shall receive interest at the. rate of six per cent, per annum on any judgment from the day such judgment is signed. There is a proviso that interest shall not be payable on judgments rendered where county warrants evidence the debt, or where a debt of any county is the subject-matter.\nThe legislative intent seems to have been that all judgments should bear interest except those expressly excluded; and since claims against \u00bfstates when converted into judgments are not excepted, the rule inclusio unius \u00e9st exclusio alterius applies. Hence, the only question seems to be, Does an order of the probate court allowing a claim against an estate rise to the dignity of a judgment? We have heretofore answered in the affirmative.\nIn Miller v. Oil City Iron Works, Chief Justice Hart discussed \u00a7 112 of Crawford & Moses Digest, and stated that the probate court\u2019s order of allowance- has the force and effect of a judgment. Support for this declaration of law was found in Jackson v. Gorman,where Chief Justice Bunn said that allowances of claims against an estate were in the nature of judgments, and after expiration of the term were not within'control of the probate court.\nApposite are decisions that an order of allowance by the county court is in the nature of a judgment. Desha County v. Newman, 33 Ark. 788.\nJudgment affirmed.\nThe payment made to Jones in 1939 was $228.22.\nCompton\u2019s account was $69, The terms \u201cremainder of his claim\u201d.\nPope\u2019s Digest, \u00a7 9399.\n184 Ark. 900, at pages 904-5; 45 S. W. 2d 36.\nNow \u00a7 111 of Pope\u2019s Digest.\n70 Ark. 88, 66 S. W. 346.\nIn the Jackson-Gorman case Clark v. Shelton, 16 Ark. 474; Dooley v. Dooley, 14 Ark. 122; West v. Waddill, 33 Ark. 575; Rogers v. Wilson, 13 Ark. 507, and Carter v. Engles, 35 Ark. 205, were cited on the question of attack on a probate court judgment. [See, also, Outlaw v. Yell, 5 Ark. 468; Dooley v. Watkins, 5 Ark. 705; McMorrin v. Overholt, 14 Ark. 244; Wright v. Campbell, 27 Ark. 637; Wolf v. Banks, 41 Ark. 104; Scott v. Penn, 68 Ark. 492, 60 S. W. 235; Hoshall v. Brown, 102 Ark. 114, 143 S. W. 1081; James v. Gibson, 73 Ark. 440, 84 S. W. 485; Brown v. Hanauer, 48 Ark. 277, 3 S. W. 27. ]\nSee cases under the title \u201cConclusiveness and Effect of Adjudication in General,\u201d \u00a7 206 (1),-\u201cCounties,\u201d v. 5, West Publishing Company\u2019s Arkansas Digest.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Grieein Smith, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Girard P. Siiofner, for appellant.",
      "Glenn F. Walther, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Shofner, Administrator v. Jones.\n4-6072\n145 S. W. 2d 350\nOpinion delivered December 9, 1940.\nGirard P. Siiofner, for appellant.\nGlenn F. Walther, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0540-01",
  "first_page_order": 558,
  "last_page_order": 560
}