{
  "id": 1488280,
  "name": "Phillips v. Quapaw Bath House Company",
  "name_abbreviation": "Phillips v. Quapaw Bath House Co.",
  "decision_date": "1943-05-10",
  "docket_number": "4-7069",
  "first_page": "816",
  "last_page": "817",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "205 Ark. 816"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "170 S.W.2d 1001"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 101,
    "char_count": 827,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.487,
    "sha256": "76a67d7cb74b4879a4f6102c17c3a959d96920740b4210c5f9155a6c7afe15a2",
    "simhash": "1:a68717822f117991",
    "word_count": 133
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:00:03.571044+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Phillips v. Quapaw Bath House Company."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Griffin Smith, C. J.\nThe judgment (a jury having-been waived) absolved the Bath House Company of negligence, notwithstanding appellant\u2019s shoulder was slightly cut when she came into contact with a piece of rusty tin \u2014 which, as she expressed it, \u2018 \u2018. . . was sticking out the edge of the door. \u2019 \u2019\nTbe court found that although in- different circumstances presence of the tin would have constituted negligence, proof was lacking that it had been in a position to cause danger a sufficient length of time to have been discovered by the defendant in the exercise of ordinary care. We cannot say this holding is not supported by substantial evidence.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Griffin Smith, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Jay M. Rowland, for appellant.",
      "\u25a0 Martin, Wootton & Martin, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Phillips v. Quapaw Bath House Company.\n4-7069\n170 S. W. 2d 1001\nOpinion delivered May 10, 1943.\nJay M. Rowland, for appellant.\n\u25a0 Martin, Wootton & Martin, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0816-01",
  "first_page_order": 836,
  "last_page_order": 837
}