{
  "id": 1481831,
  "name": "Mallett v. State",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mallett v. State",
  "decision_date": "1944-06-19",
  "docket_number": "4356",
  "first_page": "471",
  "last_page": "471",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "207 Ark. 471"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 101,
    "char_count": 892,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.482,
    "sha256": "26abc72c8f1899f7d7e4453e406f6ac0ffbc3872f80affa77513ec10c3bb4214",
    "simhash": "1:6c8bbc022630c087",
    "word_count": 130
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:46:39.394631+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Mallett v. State."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.\nAppellant, sixty-eight years of age, was charged by information with having had carnal knowledge of Maxine Wells. The crime is alleged to have occurred December 15, 1943. Maxine testified that she would be fifteen in July, 1944. In returning its.verdict of guilty and assessing punishment at a year in the penitentiary, clemency was recommended. The Court, acting within its discretion, disregarded the recommendation and rendered judgment.\nThe appeal questions sufficiency of the evidence.\nWithout entering into a detailed discussion of essential testimony, involving lascivious conduct,' it is sufficient to say that the verdict is supported by substantial testimony. Affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Griffin Smith, Chief Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charley Eddy, for appellant.",
      "Guy E. Williams, Attorney General, and Oscar E. Ellis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Mallett v. State.\n4356\nOpinion delivered June 19, 1944.\nCharley Eddy, for appellant.\nGuy E. Williams, Attorney General, and Oscar E. Ellis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0471-01",
  "first_page_order": 509,
  "last_page_order": 509
}