{
  "id": 1481731,
  "name": "Brickey v. The G. R. Brickey Mercantile Company",
  "name_abbreviation": "Brickey v. G. R. Brickey Mercantile Co.",
  "decision_date": "1944-11-27",
  "docket_number": "4-7475",
  "first_page": "989",
  "last_page": "994",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "207 Ark. 989"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "183 S.W.2d 606"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "21 S. W. 2d 871",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "180 Ark. 459",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1393510
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/180/0459-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 475,
    "char_count": 9789,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.521,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2240919645422112e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6006116572819497
    },
    "sha256": "1fec2997e18324cb74d289dfe721d5c0f07b7987f03754bcc7e4ce54c24a3e22",
    "simhash": "1:caaa58a87fbae4c8",
    "word_count": 1727
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:46:39.394631+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Brickey v. The G. R. Brickey Mercantile Company."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Holt, J.\nFor more than a quarter of a century prior to 1932, The G. R. Brickey Mercantile Company, a corporation, had been in active operation in Osceola, Arkansas. On August 2, 1932, the company had become so involved and burdened with debt that it made a written assignment for the benefit of its creditors of \u201call the assets belonging to The G. R. Brickey Mercantile Company, excepting the store building, \u201d to V. G. Lane, vice-president of the \u00a5m. R. Moore Company of Memphis, Tenn., (one of the largest creditors) with authority\u2019\u201cas trustee to handle the business or assets in such manner as he may deem best for the interest of the creditors, that is he may operate the business, may convert it into money either in the usual course of business or by private or public sale. The intent hereof is to empower the said trustee with the same rights of disposition or otherwise over said property as if he were the absolute owner,\u201d etc. This assignment was signed by \u201cThe G. R. Brickey Mercantile Company, By A. G. Brickey, President. Mrs. G. R. Brickey, Vice-President. Leon Sullivan,'Secretary. \u201d On the dat\u00e9 of this assignment, and since 1920, A. G, Brickey was, and had been, president of the company and in active charge of its business, and owned 186 shares of the capital stock of 400 shares. Following this assignment, Mr. Lane operated the company for approximately fifteen months when, the creditors not having been paid or satisfied, it was determined to sell the remaining assets of the company, for their benefit.\nThere was a meeting of the stockholders and directors of the Brickey Mercantile Company November 16, 1933; and the minutes of that date reflect the following proceedings: \u201cAt a meeting, held on the above date, at the office of the Gr. R. Brickey Mercantile Co., called hy the president, A. G. Brickey, the following directors and stockholders were present, viz: A. G. Brickey, Pres.; Leon Sullivan,.Secy.-Treas., and N. W. Brickey, Director. Absent, Mrs. L. E. Brickey. The object of the meeting was stated by Leon Sullivan, Secy.-Treas., who explained that the company owed approximately $5,000; that some of the creditors had filed suit and obtained judgments and were threatening to foreclose or execute on them. He also stated that he had been to see Mr. Lane, Trustee, on August 22, 1933. And at that meeting Mr; Lane told him' he could get the creditors to accept a compromise settlement for $1,500 cash and assumption of certain other obligations \u2014 Judgment of Geo. Balloue and account Osceola Lbr. Co. Motion was made by N. W. Brickey, and seconded, that all the stock certificates of the corporation be assigned to Y. G. Lane, Trustee, and Mr. Lane instructed to turn said certificates over to whomsoever of the stockholders paid over the $1,500 and assumed the certain indebtedness. Motion was carried and all the stock certificates turned in to the Secretary-Treasurer who in turn delivered them to Y. G. Lane, Trustee. The certificates turned in were as follows: No. 21 \u2014 186 shares, A. G. Brickey; No. 8 \u2014 40 shares, Leon Sullivan; No. 12\u2014 20 shares, Leon Sullivan; No. 15 \u2014 15 shares, Leon Sullivan; No. 18 \u2014 74 shares, Louise E. Brickey; No. 20 \u2014 60 shares, N. W. Brickey, Trustee, 400 shares.\n\u201cA. G. Brickey asked that he he given until Monday, November 20, 1933, to see if he could get up the money to buy same. Motion was made and seconded that Mr. A. G. Brickey be granted the time asked for. Motion carried, and the following was sent to Mr. Y. G. Lane, Trustee in Memphis, Tenn.:\n\u201cThe G. R. Brickey Mercantile 'Company, Osceola, Ark., November 17, 1933. Mr. Y. G. Lane, Trustee for G. R. Brickey Merc. Co., Memphis, Tenn. Dear Sir: It is agreed that Mr. A. G. Brickey will have until Monday, November 20,1933, to buy the assets of the above concern for $1,500 cash and he is to assume all liability of the G. R. Brickey Mercantile Co., and in case that he does not buy this by the above date you are at liberty to sell as per written agreement that you had with Mr. N. W. Brickey. If Mr. A. Gr. Brickey pays you the $1,500 cash he is to get a clear receipt from all merchandise creditors as per list furnished you by Mr. Sullivan and assume all other liability of The Gr. B. Brickey Mercantile Company. Yours very truly, (signed) A. G. Brickey, (signed) Leon Sullivan. \u2019 \u2019\nFollowing this meeting all the stockholders, including appellant, A. G. Brickey, assigned their stock certificates in blank to Mr. Lane, trustee, with instructions \u201cto turn said certificates over to whomsoever of the stockholders paid over the $1,500 and assumed the certain indebtedness\u201d as provided by the action of the stockholders and directors, supra.\nAppellant testified in part as follows relative to the transfer and delivery of his stock to Lane. \u201c.What were the circumstances in connection with the reissuance of the stock on that date? A. After I signed this I was given a few days in which- to get this $1,500 up. Mr. Wales said that Mr. Lane wanted the stock, and it was issued and signed, and I left it lying on the desk in the office in the company\u2019s store, got in my car and went to Memphis to try to raise the money. Q. Was there a reissuance of stock by the company in lieu of the 186 shares which you state that you lost? A. There was. Q.-State the circumstances under which the certificate for' 186 shares was reissued and when, if you remember ? A. It was reissued the same day that this letter of Mr. Wales, November 17, 1933. Q. State the circumstances under which it was reissued, as you remember ? A. I signed a statement saying that I had lost or misplaced the stock, and the stock was reissued to be put up with Mr. Lane as per the agreement we had with Mr. Lane in which all stockholders were to do the same thing. \u201d\nThe record discloses that appellant was given additional time beyond November 20, 1933, to buy the assets of the mercantile company for $1,500' in cash. When it became apparent that he was unable to raise the money with which to make the purchase, all the assets of the company were sold by Mr. Lane to N. W. Brickey for $1,500 on December 28, 1933, all the company\u2019s stock turned over to Mm and lie assumed the company\u2019s debts. N. W. Brickey reissued tlie stock of the company, none of which went to appellant, and he reorganized and continued the business.\nNovember 25, 1936, appellant filed this suit asking for an accounting \u201cshowing all transactions with reference to the merchandise, real and personal property and capital stock of the said corporation since August 2, 1932, \u2019 \u2019 and that he be restored to all of Ms rights as stockholder. Appellees denied that appellant had any interest in the company. The trial court found all issues in favor of appellees and this appeal followed.\nWhile appellant testified to the contrary, we think the great preponderance of the testimony is to the effect that appellant was not only present in person at the meeting of the stockholders and directors on November 16, 1933, but that he actively participated and agreed to the action there taken, supra. He admits that on the next day, November 17th, following the action of the .company, supra, he went to Mr. Lane\u2019s office, and after informing him that Ms, appellant\u2019s, certificate to his 186 shares of stock was lost, he signed an affidavit to this effect, and a new stock certificate was issued to him, which he immediately indorsed and signed in blank, and delivered to the .trustee, and in his own words \u201cto be put up with Mr. Lane as per the agreement we had with Mr. Lane in which all stockholders were to do the same thing.\u201d He admitted that he was given the option as stated in the letter, supra, to purchase all the assets of the company for $1,500 cash by November 20th and that additional time beyond this was given him, but that he was unable to raise the money with which to make the purchase.\nThere is no evidence here of fraud or deception in the assignment and transfer of appellant\u2019s stock to Mr. Lane, the trustee, or in the subsequent sale of all the assets of the company to N. W. Brickey by Lane, as trustee. When appellant indorsed, signed and delivered his stock certificate to Lane, under the agreement of the stockholders and directors, supra, he did all that was required under our statute to constitute an absolute transfer of the legal and equitable title to the stock and all of his interests therein, and in so doing he parted with all of his interests in the assets of-the mercantile company, whether such assets be composed of realty, personalty or merchandise.\nSection 2150 of Pope\u2019s Digest provides: \u201cThe title to a certificate and to the share represented thereby can be transferred only: (a) by delivery of the certificate indorsed either in blank or to a specified person by the person appearing by the certificate to be the owner of the shares represented thereby, \u2019 \u2019 etc.\nIn Stroud v. Henderson, 180 Ark. 459, 21 S. W. 2d 871, the court said: \u201cThis court has several times held that the transfer of stock referred to in this section \u00cd3 the absolute transfer of the legal and equitable title to the stock, and not pledges or liens by way of collateral security.\u201d See, also, 7 R. C. L., \u00a7 242, p. 264; 13 Am. Jur., \u00a7 340, p. 414.\nN. W. Brickey paid $1,500 cash, a valuable consideration, for the assets of the company which, in the circumstances here, carried with the purchase, all the stock of the corporation. When this sale was made to N. W. Brickey all of appellant\u2019s interest in the stock and assets of The Gr. E. Brickey Mercantile Company came to an end.\nFinding no error, the decree is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Holt, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "D. F. Taylor and Wils Davis, for appellant.",
      "Ivy & Nailling, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Brickey v. The G. R. Brickey Mercantile Company.\n4-7475\n183 S. W. 2d 606\nOpinion delivered November 27, 1944.\nD. F. Taylor and Wils Davis, for appellant.\nIvy & Nailling, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0989-01",
  "first_page_order": 1027,
  "last_page_order": 1032
}