{
  "id": 1475708,
  "name": "Union Life Insurance Company v. Pritchett",
  "name_abbreviation": "Union Life Insurance v. Pritchett",
  "decision_date": "1945-12-10",
  "docket_number": "4-7773",
  "first_page": "487",
  "last_page": "488",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ark. 487"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "190 S.W.2d 968"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "108 S. W. 2d 1089",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "194 Ark. 557",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8722988
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/194/0557-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "113 S. W. 2d 91",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "195 Ark. 521",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8722237
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/195/0521-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "264 S. W. 942",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "165 Ark. 338",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1379835
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/165/0338-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "197 S. W. 1154",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "131 Ark. 593",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "46 Ark. 524",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1890484
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/46/0524-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "27 Ark. 592",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1885778
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/27/0592-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "17 Ark. 478",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8726530
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/17/0478-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 152,
    "char_count": 1508,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.512,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.055271562164435066
    },
    "sha256": "40cad13af1d940e55d11c7fb5e443c65855070ca08413f58d28b968ca1b83259",
    "simhash": "1:78b99c7010af1089",
    "word_count": 266
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:58:59.179776+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Union Life Insurance Company v. Pritchett."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Bobins, J.\nAppellant challenges the correctness of trial jury\u2019s finding that appellant had failed to establish its defense to appellee\u2019s suit for amount of insurance policy on the life of Mrs. Bena Pritchett, deceased wife of appellee. Appellant denied liability on the ground that Mrs. Pritchett was not in sound health when she applied for and when she received from appellant a policy of life insurance for $300, payable at her death to appellee.\nThere was testimony by lay witnesses and also by a physician tending to establish that Mrs. Pritchett was in good health when she applied for the insurance and when the policy was delivered to her. This testimony was to some extent contradicted by evidence offered by appellant; but the case was submitted to a jury, on instructions not complained of here, and the jury\u2019s finding in favor of appellee on the disputed fact question is conclusive and binding on us. Houch v. Lynch, 17 Ark. 478; Smith v. Van Gilder, 27 Ark. 592; Cogswell v. McKeogh, 46 Ark. 524; W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Thurman, 131 Ark. 593, 197 S. W. 1154; Collier Commission Company v. Wright, 165 Ark. 338, 264 S. W. 942; American Equitable Assurance Company of New York v. Showers, 195 Ark. 521, 113 S. W. 2d 91; The Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. Sams, 194 Ark. 557, 108 S. W. 2d 1089.\nThe judgment of the lower court is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Bobins, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "E. M. Arnold, for appellant.",
      "David L. Ford, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Union Life Insurance Company v. Pritchett.\n4-7773\n190 S. W. 2d 968\nOpinion delivered December 10, 1945.\nE. M. Arnold, for appellant.\nDavid L. Ford, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0487-01",
  "first_page_order": 503,
  "last_page_order": 504
}