{
  "id": 1868273,
  "name": "Cooper vs. The State",
  "name_abbreviation": "Cooper v. State",
  "decision_date": "1860-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "228",
  "last_page": "229",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "21 Ark. 228"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "17 Ark. 290",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8725804
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/17/0290-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "16 Ark. 601",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8725985
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/16/0601-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 86,
    "char_count": 894,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.509,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.7055879256711402e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7015937994840625
    },
    "sha256": "d03533a6afb16056a3ec57793bbe306430c55904a6c4518a5ba31617c89387d7",
    "simhash": "1:0dcbcd68dda75599",
    "word_count": 160
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:46:32.809826+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Cooper vs. The State."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Compton\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThis was an indictment for Sabbath breaking. The appellant pleaded in abatement, substantially as was pleaded in the case of Wilburn vs The State, decided at the present term; and upon the plea, an issue of f\u00e1et was made up and submitted, for trial, to the court sitting a jury.\nThe court found the issue for the State, and rendered judgment against the appellant for fine and costs. This was error. The issue should have been tried by jury, as falling within the rule laid down by this court in Wilson vs. The State 16 Ark. 601; Bond vs. The State 17 Ark. 290.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Compton"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Garland & Randolph, for the appellant.",
      "Hollowell, Attorney General, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Cooper vs. The State.\nAn isfue of fact, to a plea in abatement of an indictment, should be tried by a jury, and not by the court.\nAppeal from Chicot Circuit Court.\nHon. John C. Murray, Circuit Judge.\nGarland & Randolph, for the appellant.\nHollowell, Attorney General, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0228-01",
  "first_page_order": 230,
  "last_page_order": 231
}