{
  "id": 1868340,
  "name": "Sebastian County vs. Sutton et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sebastian County v. Sutton",
  "decision_date": "1860-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "402",
  "last_page": "402",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "21 Ark. 402"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "13 Ark. 344",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8728154
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/13/0344-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "13 Ark. 344",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8728154
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/13/0344-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 95,
    "char_count": 830,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.443,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.06877466601334672
    },
    "sha256": "671d1cb6d7773a2da76d85cb6ca3ccca7ed224d4f1f3306c55837f765fa9f011",
    "simhash": "1:cae1e0752ac58569",
    "word_count": 148
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:46:32.809826+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Sebastian County vs. Sutton et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Hon. Chief Justice English\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThe judgment in this case must be affirmed under the rule of practice settled in State Bank vs. Conway, 13 Ark. 344\u2014which was applied in Gardner vs. Miller et al., (present term,) a case similar to this.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Hon. Chief Justice English"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "G. J. Clark, for appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Sebastian County vs. Sutton et al.\nWhere no motion for a new trial has been made, nor any question of law reserved at the trial, there is nothing before this court for adjudication.\nThe rule established in State Bank vs. Conway, 13 Ark. 344 \u2014 which is simple, and easily understood and followed \u2014 applies as well to cases submitted to the court as to a jury; and to casos where there is an agreed statement of facts, as where the facts are proved by witnesses.\nAppeal from Sebastian Circuit Court.\nHon. Felix I. Batson, Circuit Judge.\nG. J. Clark, for appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0402-01",
  "first_page_order": 404,
  "last_page_order": 404
}