{
  "id": 1464621,
  "name": "Jackson v. State",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jackson v. State",
  "decision_date": "1949-05-30",
  "docket_number": "4561",
  "first_page": "420",
  "last_page": "421",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "215 Ark. 420"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "220 S.W.2d 800"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "293 S.W. 714",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "373 Ark. 674",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 101,
    "char_count": 836,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.466,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.741498212696073e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5308350023495578
    },
    "sha256": "992a4fa41fbe142627056ae5c3fa6ed3c93ae1c79597cb4f0c3e4c613960d220",
    "simhash": "1:40af8a67dca6544c",
    "word_count": 136
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:42:13.131733+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Jackson v. State."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "George Rose Smith, J.\nAppellant was indicted for\nburglary and grand larceny and appeals from a judgment sentencing liim to imprisonment for ten years. I)odd Teague, an accomplice in the commission of tlie crimes, had pleaded guilty to a separate indictment charging him with the same offenses. The evidence was amply sufficient to sustain the jury\u2019s verdict, but the State was permitted to introduce the record of Teague\u2019s plea of guilty. We passed upon the same question in Hammond v. State, 373 Ark. 674, 293 S.W. 714, and held that the admission of such evidence constitutes prejudicial error. ,The judgment must therefore be reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "George Rose Smith, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "George F. Edivardes, for appellant.",
      "Ike Murry, Attorney General and Robert Downie, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Jackson v. State.\n4561\n220 S. W. 2d 800\nOpinion delivered May 30, 1949.\nGeorge F. Edivardes, for appellant.\nIke Murry, Attorney General and Robert Downie, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0420-01",
  "first_page_order": 442,
  "last_page_order": 443
}
