{
  "id": 1656575,
  "name": "Wilson v. Border Queen Kitchen Cabinet Company",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wilson v. Border Queen Kitchen Cabinet Co.",
  "decision_date": "1953-02-09",
  "docket_number": "4-10,000",
  "first_page": "580",
  "last_page": "583",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "221 Ark. 580"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "254 S.W.2d 682"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "220 Ark. 265",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1660144
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/220/0265-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "217 Ark. 625",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8723029
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/217/0625-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "214 Ark. 416",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8721853
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/214/0416-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 324,
    "char_count": 4594,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.505,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.181100842601303e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4298632854656777
    },
    "sha256": "6ace503276af41e072a23251771163c2f00d9762d848c709dd2fa3790d9e8159",
    "simhash": "1:fb7bb45512068a30",
    "word_count": 781
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:46:24.085624+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice Holt not participating."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Wilson v. Border Queen Kitchen Cabinet Company."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Ed. P. McFaddin, Justice.\nThis is a Workmen\u2019s Compensation case, and involves the time limit for filing a claim.\nOn August 22, 1949, James Wilson, (hereinafter called \u201cClaimant\u201d) was engaged in pushing a load of lumber for Border Queen Kitchen Cabinet Company (hereinafter called \u201cEmployer\u201d) when some part of the lumber or truck injured claimant\u2019s knee. He was promptly sent to Dr. Knight, who treated him that day and also on September 2nd and September 10th of 1949. An X-ray disclosed no bone fracture. On the last mentioned day, the Doctor told the claimant he need not return unless his knee troubled him further. The claimant resumed work on September 1, 1949, and received no compensation \u2014 other than the aforementioned medical services for his injuries.\nClaimant continued to work for the employer; and on October 17, 1951 \u2014 after a lapse of more than two years from the last medical treatment \u2014 claimant reported to the employer that the old knee injury had been causing trouble all along and had become serious. The employer promptly sent the claimant to the same doctor who had treated him in 1949, and the doctor\u2019s 1951 report reads:\n\u2018 \u2018 Examination revealed the knee to be swollen. There was atrophy of the thigh muscles showing the patient was definitely favoring the knee and that it was giving him trouble. Also on examination I was able to elicit a definite click which is quite indicative of torn meniscus. X-rays revealed an area in the condyle of the femur apparently where a fragment of bone had become detached. I felt that the patient\u2019s knee should be operated on . . .\u201d\nBecause of the lapse of more than two years \u2014 -September 10, 1949, to October 17, 1951 \u2014 between visits to the doctor and present claim of impairment, the employer\u2019s insurance carrier denied liability; and on- facts \u2022as hereinbefore detailed, the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Commission denied the claimant an award, saying:\n\u201cUpon consideration of all the evidence, it is our opinion that the claimant\u2019s right to compensation is barred because the claim was not filed within two years following the date of accident, or one year following the last rendition of medical treatment by the respondents. \u2019 \u2019\nThe Circuit Court affirmed the Commission; and we agree that the Commission was correct. Our Workmen\u2019s Compensation Law of 1939 provided in \u00a7 18 (a):\n\u201cThe right of compensation for disability under this Act shall be barred unless a claim therefor is filed within one yeaf after date of the injury . . .\u201d (Italics supplied.) Under that section, we decided such cases as Sanderson v. Crow, 214 Ark. 416, 216 S. W. 2d 796; Donaldson v. Calvert, 217 Ark. 625, 232 S. W. 2d 651; and T. J. Moss Tie & Timber Co. v. Martin, 220 Ark. 265, 247 S. W. 2d 198.\nBut at the 1948 General Election, the People adopted Initiated Act No. 4, which changed the previously quoted language of the 1939 Act so that the law on the same point now reads:\n\u201cA claim'for compensation for disability on account of an injury . . . shall be barred unless filed with the Commission within two years from the date of the accident ... In cases where compensation for disability has been paid on account of injury, a claim for additional compensation shall be barred unless filed with the Commission within one year from the date of the last payment of compensation, or two years from the date of accident, whichever is greater.\u201d (Italics supplied.)\nThe present case is governed by the 1948 law. It will be observed that the 1939 law stated that the time for filing a claim ran from \u201cthe injury,\u201d whereas the 1948 law (Acts 1949, p. 1420) says the time for filing a claim runs from \u201cthe accident.\u201d This distinction was pointed out in Donaldson v. Calvert, supra. In the case at bar the accident happened on August 22, 1949, and the last medical services were rendered on September 10, 1949. The claim was not filed until October 17, 1951, so it was clearly barred by the applicable statute.\nAffirmed.\nJustice Holt not participating.\nBy the provisions of \u00a7 81-1302 (i) and \u00a7 81-1311 of the Pocket Supplement of Ark. Stats, (containing the 1948 Act), \u201ccompensation\u201d means not only the money allowance, but also includes hospital and doctor bills,\nAs found in \u00a7 81-1318 (a) of the 1947 Volume of Ark. Stats.\nSee Sec. 18 (a) of Initiated Act No. 4 of 1949 which may be found in Sec. 81-1318 of the Cumulative Pocket Supplement of Ark, Stats,",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Ed. P. McFaddin, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Franklin Wilder and Gutensohn & Rag on, for appellant.",
      "Shaw, Jones & Shaw, for appellee,"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Wilson v. Border Queen Kitchen Cabinet Company.\n4-10,000\n254 S. W. 2d 682\nOpinion delivered February 9, 1953.\nFranklin Wilder and Gutensohn & Rag on, for appellant.\nShaw, Jones & Shaw, for appellee,"
  },
  "file_name": "0580-01",
  "first_page_order": 604,
  "last_page_order": 607
}