{
  "id": 1702761,
  "name": "Hardy v. Hardy",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hardy v. Hardy",
  "decision_date": "1958-05-26",
  "docket_number": "5-1415",
  "first_page": "116",
  "last_page": "117",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "229 Ark. 116"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "313 S.W.2d 387"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 183,
    "char_count": 2589,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.493,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.12982294956584e-08,
      "percentile": 0.32364859881792335
    },
    "sha256": "aa19506a2ccc971a207b2ddddf58c5edf2b7ae4acc58fe5a117c0477a6bdac3d",
    "simhash": "1:1417da547e2a1b5e",
    "word_count": 430
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:19:04.434209+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice George Rose Smith not participating."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Hardy v. Hardy."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nSubsequent to the opinion rendered in this case on April 7, 1958, appellant, Meriwether Wright Hardy, filed a petition, setting out that dividends and interest, which had accrued on the various stocks and bonds since the date of the trial court\u2019s decree (December 28, 1956), had been paid to appellees. Under the opinion rendered by this Court on April 7, 1958, appellant was given, free from the lien claimed by appellee, Corinne Hardy, one-third of Robert L. Hardy\u2019s stocks and bonds. Appellant contends that under the result reached by this Court, she is entitled to judgment for one-third of the dividends and interest which have been paid to appellees since December 28, 1956. In Item 5 of its opinion, this Court continued in effect the trial court\u2019s order allowing appellant $262.50 per month for temporary alimony, and provided that such temporary alimony \u201cshall remain in effect until such time as appellant\u2019s award of dower, herein set out, shall be satisfied in full.\u201d\nIt is conceded that the award of temporary alimony is greater than the amount of dividends and interest which appellant would have received from the stocks and bonds, if same had been divided in kind at the time of the entering of the decree. In her response to appellant\u2019s petition, appellee, Corinne Hardy, states that she \u201chas made arrangements with said bank for the release of that portion of said securities awarded appellant free of appellee\u2019s pledge. \u2019 \u2019 In view of this statement by appellee, Corinne Hardy, and the facts herein enumerated, we make the following order:\nThe order allowing appellant $262.50 per month for temporary alimony shall remain in effect until such time as appellant\u2019s award of dower in the stocks and bonds shall be satisfied, and the making of such payments shall operate in lieu of judgment for dividends and interest that may have been paid to appellees since December 28, 1956, and in lieu of amounts that may hereafter be paid until there is a division of the stocks and bonds in kind; PROVIDED, that appellant\u2019s dower in the stocks and bonds, heretofore awarded shall be satisfied in full within 120 days from the rendition of this order; otherwise, such temporary alimony shall remain in effect and be cumulative to any dividends or interest that may accrue thereafter.\nCosts in both courts against appellees.\nJustice George Rose Smith not participating.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Rose, Meek, Rouse, Barron S Rash, for appellant.",
      "Frank J. Wills, Quinn Glover, Langston & Walker and Wayne Foster, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Hardy v. Hardy.\n5-1415\n313 S. W. 2d 387\nOpinion delivered May 26, 1958.\nRose, Meek, Rouse, Barron S Rash, for appellant.\nFrank J. Wills, Quinn Glover, Langston & Walker and Wayne Foster, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0116-01",
  "first_page_order": 140,
  "last_page_order": 141
}