{
  "id": 1702644,
  "name": "Sparks Memorial Hospital v. Walton",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sparks Memorial Hospital v. Walton",
  "decision_date": "1959-01-26",
  "docket_number": "5-1750",
  "first_page": "1014",
  "last_page": "1016",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "229 Ark. 1014"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "320 S.W.2d 102"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 255,
    "char_count": 3187,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.516,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.2326328743275565e-07,
      "percentile": 0.9143841976887456
    },
    "sha256": "d2a24c22b0e06fb9559964045dd6cadd099f430d6fddf3ad1c5f8e539d96dc1c",
    "simhash": "1:278668f33d3c31b3",
    "word_count": 517
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:19:04.434209+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Sparks Memorial Hospital v. Walton."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "George Rose Smith, J.\nThis is a claim filed by the appellee, Mary Walton, for workmen\u2019s compensation. On July 11, 1956, the claimant, a housekeeper at the appellant\u2019s hospital, strained her lower back while lifting a bed. There is an abundance of evidence to show that Mrs. Walton became disabled five days later and that her incapacity still existed when the full Commission heard the case in March, 1958. The Commission found that the claimant had sustained a compensable injury, that she was temporarily totally disabled from July 16, 1956, through March 17, 1958, and that she has not reached the end of her healing period. The record was left open for further proof of her disability after March 17, 1958.\nIn contending that the order is not supported by any substantial evidence the employer stresses the fact that the many physicians who have examined the claimant have not been able to arrive at a positive medical explanation for her condition. Despite an extensive exploratory operation and a succession of examinations and treatments the doctors have not discovered an objective cause for the severe pain that Mrs. Walton has suffered in her side, abdomen, back, and right leg.\nThe physicians\u2019 uncertainty does not, in our opinion, compel the conclusion that the claim must be denied. Dr. Southard and Dr. Thompson attributed Mrs. Walton\u2019s disability to the injury she suffered at the hospital. Their testimony is substantial evidence on which to rest the Commission\u2019s finding of a causal connection between the injury and the incapacity. There is no reason for saying that the Commission, upon concluding that a compensable disability had existed for more than eighteen months, should nevertheless have withheld an award pending an exact determination of the medical cause for the claimant\u2019s condition. See Larson, Workmen\u2019s Compensation, \u00a7 79.51. The interim finding of a continuing, temporary, total disability is amply supported by the record.\nThe appellant questions a statement in the Commission\u2019s formal opinion, to the effect that the medical findings \u201cindicate to us [the commissioners] that claimant is disabled by reason of a nerve root compression in the low back.\u201d We do not regard this passing observation as an attempt by the commissioners to make their own diagnosis without regard to the medical evidence. It merely suggests a possibility to be explored in the course of the further proceedings that the order contemplates. The essential part of the interim order is the finding, supported by substantial proof, that a disability exists and that it was caused by an accidental injury suffered in the course of the claimant\u2019s employment.\nThe appellee asks that an additional attorney\u2019s fee be allowed in connection with the appeal to this court. This request must be denied, as the statute does not authorize such an allowance. Only the Commission is empowered to award fees for legal services, Ark. Stats. 1947, \u00a7 81-1332, and the maximum fee was allowed in this case.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "George Rose Smith, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Dobbs, Pryor & Dobbs, for appellant.",
      "Edward E. Bedwell & D. L. Grace, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Sparks Memorial Hospital v. Walton.\n5-1750\n320 S. W. 2d 102\nOpinion delivered January 26, 1959.\nDobbs, Pryor & Dobbs, for appellant.\nEdward E. Bedwell & D. L. Grace, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "1014-01",
  "first_page_order": 1038,
  "last_page_order": 1040
}