{
  "id": 1866029,
  "name": "Renfro, ad. vs. White",
  "name_abbreviation": "Renfro v. White",
  "decision_date": "1861-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "195",
  "last_page": "196",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "23 Ark. 195"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 138,
    "char_count": 1603,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.514,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2240919645422112e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6009531829847995
    },
    "sha256": "b8155bb9535166aaa95425dc73d6a81d46270f4dbc6bded38a978dfea254682e",
    "simhash": "1:74f1eafebdc2e4cf",
    "word_count": 278
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:15:02.560591+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Renfro, ad. vs. White."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice English\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nRenfro was the administrator de bonis non of Bolen C. Phillips, deceased, under bond in the penal sum of $200,000.\nWhite, one of his sureties, made application to the Probate Court of Hempstead county, from which his letters had issued, for an order requiring him to execute a new bond, upon the ground that his original bond had not been taken according to law, the sureties being insufficient.\nUpon the notice and affidavit required by sec. 36, chap. 4, Gould\u2019s Dig., and upon proof that the aggregate value of the property of the sureties in the bond was not equal to the value of the personal estate of Phillips, in the hands of Renfro, the Probate Court ordered him to give a new bond. Pie appealed from the order to the Circuit Court, where, on inspection of the record, the judgment of the Probate Court was affirmed, and he appealed to this court.\nUpon examination of the record, we find no satisfactory showing that the Probate Court exercised unwarranted authority, or abused the sound legal discretion vested in it by law; in making the order complained of. See State, use, etc. vs, Stroop, ante.\nThe judgment of the Circuit Court must be affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice English"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Gallagher, for the appellant.",
      "Hempstead, for the appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Renfro, ad. vs. White.\nIt is within the power of the Probate Court, on the application of a surety in an administration bond, to require the administrator to- give a new bond, when it is made to appear that the sureties in his bond are insufficient.\nAppeal from, Hempstead Circuit Court.\nHon. Lem B. Green, Circuit Judge.\nGallagher, for the appellant.\nHempstead, for the appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0195-01",
  "first_page_order": 203,
  "last_page_order": 204
}