{
  "id": 1688299,
  "name": "Loftis v. Edwards",
  "name_abbreviation": "Loftis v. Edwards",
  "decision_date": "1962-02-12",
  "docket_number": "5-2590",
  "first_page": "632",
  "last_page": "633",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "234 Ark. 632"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "353 S.W.2d 535"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "228 Ark. 45",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8717431
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/228/0045-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 114,
    "char_count": 1021,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.531,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0446031217563963e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7499141841860278
    },
    "sha256": "d5f087e24481d84f6a7355143badd679c08bb38db19d12d5531f0469fd06722b",
    "simhash": "1:ea74517548009b92",
    "word_count": 174
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:15:30.076044+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Loftis v. Edwards."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "George Rose Smith, J.\nAt the April, 1960 term of the Pulaski chancery court the appellants obtained a default decree foreclosing a materialman\u2019s lien for $932.54, but the decree was incomplete in that it did not appoint a commissioner to conduct the sale, nor did it fix the terms of the sale. In May of 1961 the appellants filed a petition asking the chancellor to correct the earlier decree by the entry of a nunc pro tunc order supplying the omissions. This attempted appeal is from an order sustaining the appellees\u2019 demurrer to the appellants\u2019 petition.\nThe appeal must be dismissed for the reason that an order which merely sustains a demurrer to the complaint or petition, leaving the cause pending in the trial court, is not a final appealable judgment. Walters v. Burnett, 228 Ark. 45, 305 S. W. 2d 549.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "George Rose Smith, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Warren E. Wood, for appellant.",
      "Moses, McClellan, Arnold,, Owen $ McDermott, by James R. Howard, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Loftis v. Edwards.\n5-2590\n353 S. W. 2d 535\nOpinion delivered February 12, 1962.\nWarren E. Wood, for appellant.\nMoses, McClellan, Arnold,, Owen $ McDermott, by James R. Howard, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0632-01",
  "first_page_order": 654,
  "last_page_order": 655
}