{
  "id": 8727378,
  "name": "Wilson vs. The State",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wilson v. State",
  "decision_date": "1867-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "586",
  "last_page": "586",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "24 Ark. 586"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 62,
    "char_count": 539,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.42,
    "sha256": "63bf13ce9e0e4fdcd06bbd0bfa5ba07b50e65b0231ec573573a78aff4b8782e1",
    "simhash": "1:d8b1632f722015b6",
    "word_count": 90
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:52:35.837715+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Wilson vs. The State."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Compton:\nThe only question presented in this case, is precisely the same as that determined in Matthews vs. State, at the last term. The decision in that case is the law of this. Let the judgment be affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Compton:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Gallagher & Newton, for appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Wilson vs. The State.\nThe ease of Matthews vs. State, ante, approved.\nAppeal from, Ouachita Circuit Gourb.\nHon. JohN T. Bearden, Circuit Judge.\nGallagher & Newton, for appellant.\nJORDAN, Attorney General, relied upon the cases of Brittmi vs. State, 5 Eng., 301, and Matthews vs. State, decided at December term, 1866."
  },
  "file_name": "0586-01",
  "first_page_order": 594,
  "last_page_order": 594
}
