{
  "id": 1727397,
  "name": "Weist v. State",
  "name_abbreviation": "Weist v. State",
  "decision_date": "1966-04-18",
  "docket_number": "5160",
  "first_page": "680",
  "last_page": "681",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "240 Ark. 680"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "401 S.W.2d 565"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "220 Ark. 188",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1660058
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1952,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/220/0188-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 118,
    "char_count": 913,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.54,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.89950402824256e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3075706344269492
    },
    "sha256": "6a767baa3551248e39b6c3a398d828ad54d16219a8243eada3c679f6d5bfb34c",
    "simhash": "1:d1908c76a804d0ca",
    "word_count": 153
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:11:15.698686+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Amsler, J., not participating."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Weist v. State"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "George Rose Smith, Justice.\nThe appellant was convicted of negligent homicide upon proof that his drunken driving caused a traffic collision in which Don Taylor Gazaway was killed. The jury fixed the penalty at imprisonment for one year and a fine of $500.00.\nFor reversal the appellant urges a single point, that the trial court erred in permitting the prosecuting attorney, over the objection of defense counsel, to ask the witness Gage if he knew that the accused drank. A com: p\u00edete answer to this contention is simply that the question was never answered; so there could have been no prejudice. Reynolds v. State, 220 Ark. 188, 246 S. W. 2d 724 (1952).\nAffirmed.\nAmsler, J., not participating.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "George Rose Smith, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frank Slomt, W. B. Howard and Jack Segars, for appellant.",
      "Bruce Bennett, Attorney General, Fletcher Jachson, Asst. Atty. General, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Weist v. State\n5160\n401 S. W. 2d 565\nOpinion delivered April 18, 1966\nFrank Slomt, W. B. Howard and Jack Segars, for appellant.\nBruce Bennett, Attorney General, Fletcher Jachson, Asst. Atty. General, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0680-01",
  "first_page_order": 704,
  "last_page_order": 705
}