{
  "id": 1606941,
  "name": "Maxine Reed v. W. R. Whitehead",
  "name_abbreviation": "Reed v. Whitehead",
  "decision_date": "1968-09-03",
  "docket_number": "4579",
  "first_page": "52",
  "last_page": "53",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "245 Ark. 52"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "430 S.W.2d 858"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "35 S.W. 2d 1020",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "year": 1931,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "183 Ark. 271",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1441824
      ],
      "year": 1931,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/183/0271-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 135,
    "char_count": 1399,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.514,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.06025235448089831
    },
    "sha256": "d335718d212383454c85f23a909f39ba9c63eda35bf08d78507000654d36c618",
    "simhash": "1:b78bfd41626a99d0",
    "word_count": 231
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:29:50.317094+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Maxine Reed v. W. R. Whitehead"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Conley Byrd, Justice.\nAppellant Maxine Reed filed a complaint in the Chancery Court seeking to enjoin appellee W. R. Whitehead from acting in the capacity of \u201cthird member\u201d of the Dallas County Board of Election Commissioners, claiming at the same time that she was the proper person to hold such office. Appellee filed an answer and counterclaim seeking to enjoin appellant from usurping the office to which appellee claimed to have been appointed.\nThe complaint and counterclaim, considered in all their respects, must be held to be a suit for the purpose of trying title to the office of \u201cthird member\u201d of the County Board of Election Commissioners. We have consistently held that a court of equity does not have jurisdiction to determine questions concerning the appointment or election of public officers or their title to office. Davis v. Wilson, 183 Ark. 271, 35 S.W. 2d 1020 (1931).\nThe judgment entered below in favor of appellee Whitehead is reversed and the cause remanded to the Chancery Court with directions to dismiss same for lack of jurisdiction, any remaining issues which might warrant a transfer to law docket having become moot by virtue of our decision of this date in Ellis v. Rockefeller.\nReversed and dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Conley Byrd, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Wright, Lindsey & Jennings for appellant.",
      "L. Weems Trussell for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Maxine Reed v. W. R. Whitehead\n4579\n430 S.W. 2d 858\nOpinion delivered September 3, 1968\nWright, Lindsey & Jennings for appellant.\nL. Weems Trussell for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0052-01",
  "first_page_order": 76,
  "last_page_order": 77
}