{
  "id": 1864577,
  "name": "McDaniel v. Hanauer, et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "McDaniel v. Hanauer",
  "decision_date": "1867-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "48",
  "last_page": "48",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "25 Ark. 48"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 78,
    "char_count": 908,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.387,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.138363859351185e-08,
      "percentile": 0.47063458139837494
    },
    "sha256": "b159e20444adb0ac804fcf9c7d52ca9154b412b4944f1a5c2d53f9957d84ea8e",
    "simhash": "1:5ea5b5237d7dcfab",
    "word_count": 151
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:02:20.284265+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "McDaniel v. Hanauer, et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Compton, J.\nThis case is submitted to the consideration of the court on the single question as to whether the jury were well sworn.\nThe record states that the jury \u201c was duly elected, impaneled, and sworn to try the Issue joined in this case.\u201d This was sufficient. The word \u201c duly,\u201d which means properly, regularly, indicates the manner of the swearing; and the additional words \u201cto try the issue joined in this case,\u201d merely indicate 'The purpose for which the oath was administered, the meaning of all which is, substantially, that the jury was sworn according to law.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Compton, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Watkins & Nose, for appellant.",
      "G arland & Nash, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "McDaniel v. Hanauer, et al.\nThe statement in the record, that the jury was duly elected, impaneled and sworn to try the issue, is, substantially, that they were sworn according to law.\nAppeal from Laiorence Circuit Court.\nlion. L. L. Mack, Circuit Judge.\nWatkins & Nose, for appellant.\nG arland & Nash, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0048-01",
  "first_page_order": 72,
  "last_page_order": 72
}