{
  "id": 1627281,
  "name": "James NOWLIN et al v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nowlin v. State",
  "decision_date": "1972-09-11",
  "docket_number": "5747",
  "first_page": "57",
  "last_page": "57",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "253 Ark. 57"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "484 S.W.2d 339"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "231 Ark. 737",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1697168
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1960,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/231/0737-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "234 Ark. 510",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1688434
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1961,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/234/0510-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "237 Ark. 437",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1737987
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1963,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/237/0437-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "200 S.W. 802",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.",
      "year": 1918,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "132 Ark. 210",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1576621
      ],
      "year": 1918,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/132/0210-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 817,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.836,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.1602122516848844e-08,
      "percentile": 0.32487415289462823
    },
    "sha256": "9f48e6a1df368d7878fcaf03ccb5ee5cda7efb3c790fe07177236e30927989ab",
    "simhash": "1:601b87246c04f3cc",
    "word_count": 140
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:44:30.788798+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James NOWLIN et al v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Conley Byrd, Justice.\nAppellants James Nowlin, Bruce Nowlin and Gary Nowlin were convicted of third degree rape for having sexual intercourse with a girl under 16 years of age upon the uncorroborated testimony of the prosecuting witness. They contend that such uncorroborated testimony is insufficient to sustain a conviction. We have held to the contrary in numerous cases. See Ragsdale v. State, 132 Ark. 210, 200 S.W. 802 (1918): Rogers v. State, 237 Ark. 437, 373 S.W. 2d 705 (1963); Skaggs v. State, 234 Ark. 510, 353 S.W. 2d 3 (1961); and Powell v. State, 231 Ark. 737, 332 S.W. 2d 483 (1960).\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Conley Byrd, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Harold L. Hall, for appellants.",
      "Ray Thornton, Atty. Gen., by: James A. Neal, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James NOWLIN et al v. STATE of Arkansas\n5747\n484 S.W. 2d 339\nOpinion delivered September 11, 1972\nHarold L. Hall, for appellants.\nRay Thornton, Atty. Gen., by: James A. Neal, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0057-01",
  "first_page_order": 81,
  "last_page_order": 81
}