{
  "id": 8717630,
  "name": "Rembert Lee HUNT v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hunt v. State",
  "decision_date": "1973-09-10",
  "docket_number": "CR 73-73",
  "first_page": "51",
  "last_page": "52",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "255 Ark. 51"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "498 S.W.2d 654"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "214 Ark. 194",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8719282
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1948,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/214/0194-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 166,
    "char_count": 1690,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.815,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20847856380816024
    },
    "sha256": "d6dfacc25b35ba01fd498bfee22a146ee813520b00412db57af14ed8c5fde98c",
    "simhash": "1:2fd60dbd4e3a7b54",
    "word_count": 287
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:24:11.540726+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Rembert Lee HUNT v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Conley Byrd, Justice.\nAppellant, Rembert Lee Hunt, to reverse a felony conviction for assaulting an officer with a deadly weapon, Ark. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 41-2802 (Supp. 1971), contends that the evidence is insufficient and the trial court erred in refusing to admit a glass into evidence.\nThe record shows that Officer Larry Dill, in street dress, and two other uniformed officers of the Little Rock Police Department went to a club to arrest two black female suspects. After the females were taken into custody, appellant, according to some of the witnesses, made inquiry of the officers as to where they were taking the suspects. Appellant then assaulted Officer Dill with a drink glass which was broken during the assault. Officer Dill suffered a cut behind his ear requiring several stitches. Some of the witnesses described the glass used by appellant as an eight ounce glass. At the trial the court refused to permit \u00e1ppellant to introduce a four ounce glass into evidence.\nIn Jackson v. State, 214 Ark. 194, 215 S.W. 2d 148 (1948), we held that any object likely to produce death or great bodily harm could be a deadly weapon. We find no merit in appellant\u2019s contention that the evidence is insufficient.\nNeither can we find merit in the contention that the trial court erred in refusing to permit the four ounce glass to be introduced into evidence. We cannot say that it was sufficiently identified as being similar to the glass used in the assault.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Conley Byrd, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Carpenter, Finch \u00e9r McArthur, for appellant.",
      "Jim Guy Tucker, Atty. Gen., by: Philip M. Wilson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Rembert Lee HUNT v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 73-73\n498 S.W. 2d 654\nOpinion delivered September 10, 1973\nCarpenter, Finch \u00e9r McArthur, for appellant.\nJim Guy Tucker, Atty. Gen., by: Philip M. Wilson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0051-01",
  "first_page_order": 73,
  "last_page_order": 74
}