{
  "id": 8718243,
  "name": "David GARRISON v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Garrison v. State",
  "decision_date": "1974-10-21",
  "docket_number": "CR 74-101",
  "first_page": "138",
  "last_page": "139",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "257 Ark. 138"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "515 S.W.2d 222"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "17 L. Ed. 312",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "L. Ed.",
      "year": 1966,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "385 U.S. 206",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "U.S.",
      "case_ids": [
        11336196
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1966,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/385/0206-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 101,
    "char_count": 749,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.815,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20848840994204682
    },
    "sha256": "b924fbd1c8e5fac52a8ddd726df0e3664c842a2759d95f67f96a6d520329bd33",
    "simhash": "1:2e48e0692d6016d6",
    "word_count": 122
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:16:07.797047+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "David GARRISON v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Conley Byrd, Justice.\nAppellant David Garrison\u2019s sole contention for reversal of his two year conviction and sentence for possession of a controlled substance (LSD) is that the trial court should have excluded under the Fourth Amendment, as an illegal search, any evidence of the drugs that he voluntarily delivered to a confidential informant and an undercover narcotics agent. We find no merit in the contention. See Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206, 87 S. Ct. 424, 17 L. Ed. 312 (1966).\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Conley Byrd, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Adams & Covington, for appellant.",
      "Jim Guy Tucker, Atty. Gen., by: Gary Isbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "David GARRISON v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 74-101\n515 S.W. 2d 222\nOpinion delivered October 21, 1974\n[Rehearing denied December 2, 1974.]\nAdams & Covington, for appellant.\nJim Guy Tucker, Atty. Gen., by: Gary Isbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0138-01",
  "first_page_order": 162,
  "last_page_order": 163
}