{
  "id": 8726815,
  "name": "Hastings v White, et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hastings v. White",
  "decision_date": "1870-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "308",
  "last_page": "309",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "26 Ark. 308"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "25 Ark. 246",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1864484
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/25/0246-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "24 Ark. 269",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8726901
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/24/0269-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 118,
    "char_count": 1345,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.442,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20861640968257222
    },
    "sha256": "016dde31dad22eb4195064770fcffff93a8fa18e4a8123d78c3ecfe63ebe1dcc",
    "simhash": "1:f1e16913e8735e53",
    "word_count": 227
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:17:12.742099+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Hastings v White, et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "GREGG, J.\nThis was an action of debt, brought in the Randolph circuit court. The case was appealed from a judgment there to this court, and decided at the December term, 1866. 24 Ark. 269. The judgment in the circuit court was there reversed, and the* case remanded with instructions to sustain the demurrer to appellee\u2019s second plea, wherein he set up that the note was to be discharged in Confederate money. In the meantime, the General Assembly passed \u201cAn act for the relief of persons bound by contract for the payment of Confederate money, or other paper currency,\u201d approved March 5, 1867.\nThe court below attempted to conform its action to this act,, and not to the mandate of this court, and again pronounced judgment in favor of the appellee, 'upon, the same pleadings, from which this appeal is prosecuted.\nIn the case of Leach v. Smith and wife, 25 Ark. 246, the act of the Legislature, above referred to, was by this court declared unconstitutional.\nThe judgment of the Randolph circuit court is again reversed, and the case remanded, to be proceeded in according to law.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "GREGG, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Ratcliffe, English, Gantt \u00a7- English, for appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Hastings v White, et al.\n\u00edOonstitutiouaIj Law. \u2014 The act, approved March 5th, 1867, known as the Confederate money act, is unconstitutional.\nAppeal from Randolph Circuit Court.\nHon. L. L. Mack, Circuit Judge.\nRatcliffe, English, Gantt \u00a7- English, for appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0308-01",
  "first_page_order": 324,
  "last_page_order": 325
}