{
  "id": 1675959,
  "name": "TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY & MANPOWER, INC. v. Jimmy Lee PERRY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Travelers Insurance v. Perry",
  "decision_date": "1977-11-07",
  "docket_number": "77-250",
  "first_page": "398",
  "last_page": "400",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "262 Ark. 398"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "557 S.W.2d 200"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "504 S.W. 2d 365",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        8725726
      ],
      "year": 1974,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/255/0950-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "255 Ark. 951",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8725756
      ],
      "year": 1974,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/255/0951-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 239,
    "char_count": 3228,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.913,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 3.2422178916296263e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8683948369190636
    },
    "sha256": "2c08108d001ba141df022f43c9fddfd546cf024b48307ef31ce8781c6b1ae3f5",
    "simhash": "1:d75c85d1b35ac1d7",
    "word_count": 545
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:27:42.068781+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "We agree. Harris, C.J., and George Rose Smith and Fogleman, JJ."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY & MANPOWER, INC. v. Jimmy Lee PERRY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Darrell Hickman, Justice.\nThis is an appeal from a Workmen\u2019s Compensation case. The only issue before us questions the finding by the Commission, affirmed by the circuit court, that the claimant had an average wage of $88.00 a week.\nWe find no substantial evidence to support this finding and, therefore, reverse the judgment entered.\nIt is undisputed that Jimmy Lee Perry was injured in the course of his employment. The administrative trial judge determined that he should receive the minimum benefits of $15.00 a week during the period of his disability. This award was based on a finding that Perry\u2019s average weekly wage was $30.00 a week.\nThe Workmen\u2019s Compensation Commission disagreed with the finding of the administrative judge and found that Perry\u2019s average weekly wage was $88.00 a week thereby entitling him to compensation of $57.20 a week. The Pulaski County Circuit Court affirmed this finding. The employer, Manpower, Inc., and its insurance company, Travelers, then appealed questioning the conclusion of the Commission as to Perry\u2019s average weekly wage. The Commission concluded that this figure was proper because of the nature of Perry\u2019s employment.\nOn May 27, 1975 Perry signed up to work for Manpower, Inc. \u2014 an organization in Pulaski County, Arkansas that provides workers for employers who need temporary help. From May 27th until July the 2nd, Perry worked only four days and was paid a total of about $63.00. His pay was $2.20 per hour. It is not disputed that Perry worked one day, the week ending June 1st; two days, the week ending June 22nd; and the day he was injured, which was July 2nd.\nThe Commission found that this case was very similar to the case of a lumberman who seldom worked a full five day week due to the nature of the timber industry. Gill v. Ozark Forest Products, 255 Ark. 951, 504 S.W. 2d 365 (1974). However, the facts in Gill are easily distinguished. In Gill it was undisputed that the worker had a \u201ccontract of hire in force\u201d which provided for a 40-hour work week at an agreed rate whenever work was available. The claimant always worked when needed.\nIn this case there was no contract between Perry and Manpower. Perry simply made himself available for work and Manpower assigned him to an employer. Perry did not have a contract that required him to work or to be available for work.\nThere is a dispute as to whether Perry made himself available at all times during this six-week period for work. It is undisputed that he was only paid for a total of four days over the six-week period of time.\nWe find no substantial evidence to support the finding by the Commission that Perry\u2019s average weekly wage was $88.00.\nTherefore, the Commission and lower court were in error. Judgment should be entered for Perry for the minimum amount authorized by law, which is $15.00 a week.\nReversed and remanded for further action not inconsistent with this opinion.\nReversed and remanded.\nWe agree. Harris, C.J., and George Rose Smith and Fogleman, JJ.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Darrell Hickman, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Byron S. Southern, of Southern, Alexander & Gunter, for appellants.",
      "James F. O\u2019Hara, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY & MANPOWER, INC. v. Jimmy Lee PERRY\n77-250\n557 S.W. 2d 200\nOpinion delivered November 7, 1977\n(Division I)\nByron S. Southern, of Southern, Alexander & Gunter, for appellants.\nJames F. O\u2019Hara, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0398-01",
  "first_page_order": 434,
  "last_page_order": 436
}