{
  "id": 1668879,
  "name": "Carmel B. JONES et al v. Cy CARNEY, Jr.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jones v. Carney",
  "decision_date": "1978-10-23",
  "docket_number": "78-105",
  "first_page": "405",
  "last_page": "406",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "264 Ark. 405"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "572 S.W.2d 585"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 131,
    "char_count": 1242,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.93,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.370710586428907e-08,
      "percentile": 0.27456137404149816
    },
    "sha256": "e5596ccd8fc010eb6b1eb322da6d61545ccfdb342f1c8a192640c912dbab1f86",
    "simhash": "1:c917d3d28e9b1476",
    "word_count": 206
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:22:41.361067+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Harris, C.J., and Holt and Howard, JJ."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Carmel B. JONES et al v. Cy CARNEY, Jr."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "George Rose Smith, Justice.\nThe principal appellant, Mrs. Jones, applied for a permit to operate a liquor store in Fayetteville. The Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, after a hearing, reversed the ruling of its director and granted the permit. The circuit court in turn reversed the Board, for want of substantial evidence. This appeal is from the circuit court\u2019s judgment, a supersedeas bond having been given to keep the store open during the pendency of the appeal.\nThe appellant\u2019s abstract of the record can, in truth, hardly be called an abstract at all. It copies the Board\u2019s decision, but it contains no other information of value to us in passing upon the appeal. It is argued that the Board\u2019s decision is supported by substantial evidence, but not a syllable of the evidence is abstracted. We are not in a position to say that the circuit court\u2019s judgment is erroneous.\nAffirmed.\nWe agree.\nHarris, C.J., and Holt and Howard, JJ.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "George Rose Smith, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Murphy & Carlisle, for Carmel B. Jones and John W. Bailey, for Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, appellants.",
      "Crouch, Blair, Cypert & Waters, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Carmel B. JONES et al v. Cy CARNEY, Jr.\n78-105\n572 S.W. 2d 585\nOpinion delivered October 23, 1978\n(Division I)\n[Rehearing denied November 27, 1978.]\nMurphy & Carlisle, for Carmel B. Jones and John W. Bailey, for Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, appellants.\nCrouch, Blair, Cypert & Waters, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0405-01",
  "first_page_order": 433,
  "last_page_order": 434
}