{
  "id": 1669012,
  "name": "Daniel Lon GRAHAM v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Graham v. State",
  "decision_date": "1979-01-08",
  "docket_number": "CR 78-36",
  "first_page": "804",
  "last_page": "804",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "264 Ark. 804"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "575 S.W.2d 149"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "572 S.W. 2d 385",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1668862
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/264/0489-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 128,
    "char_count": 1320,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.85,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.923431549370884e-08,
      "percentile": 0.42025249348514143
    },
    "sha256": "ce214e0d921d7479c592d0a303f9a6a9cdb3e345fad14682c75b12bba02cf456",
    "simhash": "1:9d3310ecc190f92e",
    "word_count": 222
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:22:41.361067+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Daniel Lon GRAHAM v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM\nThe court appointed attorney for petitioner has filed his motion for allowance of attorney\u2019s fees in this case upon the erroneous premise that he has fulfilled his duties in the present case. Counsel has taken our per curiam order of October 30, 1978, appearing in 264 Ark. at 489, 572 S.W. 2d 385, as a denial of a belated appeal. This is a misinterpretation of that order. The order concludes with the statement:\nAppropriate action in this matter should be taken by the petitioner in the trial court.\nThe per curiam order of October 30, 1978 only denied the petitioner\u2019s petition to vacate his conviction and to discharge him, which was filed on September 7, 1978. It was the intention of this court by that per curiam order to point out that the burden of supplying a transcript of the proceedings at petitioner\u2019s trial rested upon him. Counsel\u2019s responsibilities include the taking of appropriate steps for obtaining a transcript of the record or a reconstruction thereof.\nPetitioner\u2019s court appointed counsel is allowed a fee of $300 for services to date and $32.22 for our-of-pocket expenses.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Harold Hall, Public Defender, for petitioner.",
      "Bill Clinton, Atty. Gen., by: Joseph H.. Purvis, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Daniel Lon GRAHAM v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 78-36\n575 S.W. 2d 149\nJanuary 8, 1979\nHarold Hall, Public Defender, for petitioner.\nBill Clinton, Atty. Gen., by: Joseph H.. Purvis, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0804-01",
  "first_page_order": 838,
  "last_page_order": 838
}