{
  "id": 1719783,
  "name": "FARRCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al v. Webster GOLEMAN",
  "name_abbreviation": "Farrco Construction Co. v. Goleman",
  "decision_date": "1979-11-19",
  "docket_number": "79-277",
  "first_page": "159",
  "last_page": "160",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "267 Ark. 159"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "589 S.W.2d 573"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "31 Ark. L. Rev. 359",
      "category": "journals:journal",
      "reporter": "Ark. L. Rev.",
      "year": 1977,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "575 S.W. 2d 677",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1668910
      ],
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/264/0874-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "264 Ark. 841",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1668735
      ],
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/264/0841-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "263 Ark. 113",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1672700
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1978,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/263/0113-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "261 Ark. 793",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1678888
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1977,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/261/0793-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 144,
    "char_count": 1398,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.895,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3685580315388968e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6378250237755174
    },
    "sha256": "7cb307f3ace42831d3c05f7434f80343600271e835e07934ea97c48139a19a85",
    "simhash": "1:d30c8ee4de3cc17f",
    "word_count": 224
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:44:49.696704+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Harris, C.J., not participating.",
      "George Rose Smith, J., would affirm the judgment on its merits."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "FARRCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al v. Webster GOLEMAN"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "DARRELL HICKMAN, Justice.\nThis is an appeal of a Workers\u2019 Compensation case by Farreo Construction Company and its insurance carrier. The appellant did not abstract the administrative trial judge\u2019s opinion, the Workers\u2019 Compensation Commission decision nor the circuit court order, all of which favored appellee, Webster Goleman. We find this a violation of Rule 9(d) of the Supreme Court Rules.\nWe cannot distinguish this case from Manes v. M.O.V.E., Inc., et al, 261 Ark. 793, 552 S.W. 2d 211 (1977) where we affirmed the Workers\u2019 Compensation Commission order because the order was not abstracted by the appellant.\nWe explained in Bank of Ozark v. Isaacs, 263 Ark. 113, 563 S.W. 2d 707 (1978), the necessity for the appellant\u2019s brief to properly contain an abstract of the record. In the case of Wade v. Franklin-Stricklin Land Surveyors, Inc., 264 Ark. 841, 575 S.W. 2d 677 (1979), we referred to numerous recent cases which were affirmed because of noncompliance with Rule 9(d). See also Smith, Arkansas Appellate Practice; Abstracting the Record, 31 Ark. L. Rev. 359 (1977).\nAffirmed.\nHarris, C.J., not participating.\nGeorge Rose Smith, J., would affirm the judgment on its merits.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "DARRELL HICKMAN, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bridges, Young, Matthews, Holmes & Drake, for appellants.",
      "Gibbs Ferguson, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "FARRCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al v. Webster GOLEMAN\n79-277\n589 S.W. 2d 573\nOpinion delivered November 19, 1979\n(In Banc)\nBridges, Young, Matthews, Holmes & Drake, for appellants.\nGibbs Ferguson, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0159-01",
  "first_page_order": 207,
  "last_page_order": 208
}