{
  "id": 1885811,
  "name": "SLARK, STAUFFER & CO. v. VAN GILDER",
  "name_abbreviation": "Slark, Stauffer & Co. v. Van Gilder",
  "decision_date": "1871-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "58",
  "last_page": "58",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "27 Ark. 58"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1285,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.378,
    "sha256": "25ae1e129b06555d6d669018f10256eb1ae00ed0495f72f1ea2b3452cd7a424d",
    "simhash": "1:9b2bfdbf8417d394",
    "word_count": 221
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:05:16.282217+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "SLARK, STAUFFER & CO. v. VAN GILDER."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Searle. J.\nThis suit was first instituted and tried in the Probate Court of Ashley county. From the judgment of that court, the appellant*- appealed to the Circuit Court. In the Circuit Court, they moved for a trial de novo, which was overruled, and to which they excepted. Thereupon, the Circuit Court having examined the transcript, from the Probate Court, found no erf or therein, and affirmed the judgment of \u00abthe Probate Court. On account of this, as well as other\" rulings, the appellants appealed to this court.\nThe Circuit Court committed error in not trying this case de novo. Smith & Bro. vs. Van Gilder, 26 Ark.\nThe provisions of the law seem to be mandatory, and cases of this description should be tried anew, even though no motion be made for that purpose:\nFor the error, above indicated, the judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed, and the cause remanded to be proceeded in .according to law, and not inconsistent with this opinion.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Searle. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Watkins & Rose, for Appellants.",
      "J. W. Van Gilder, for Appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "SLARK, STAUFFER & CO. v. VAN GILDER.\nAppeals \u2014 Trials, de novo. \u2014 Oases, on appeal, from tlio Probate to the Circuit Courts, should be tried do novo, even though no motion bo made for that purpose.\nAPPEAL PROM ASHLEY CIRCUIT COURT.\nI Ton. Henry B. Morse, Circuit Judge.\nWatkins & Rose, for Appellants.\nJ. W. Van Gilder, for Appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0058-01",
  "first_page_order": 74,
  "last_page_order": 74
}