{
  "id": 1709160,
  "name": "Royce LOVELESS, Sr., Commissioner of the CLARENDON HOUSING AUTHORITY v. CITY OF CLARENDON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Loveless v. City of Clarendon",
  "decision_date": "1980-10-13",
  "docket_number": "80-182",
  "first_page": "705",
  "last_page": "706",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "270 Ark. 705"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "606 S.W.2d 568"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "215 S.W. 2d 138",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        8719651,
        8719694
      ],
      "year": 1949,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/214/0227-01",
        "/ark/214/0229-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "214 Ark. 227",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8719651
      ],
      "year": 1949,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/214/0227-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "247 Ark. 822",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1600714
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1969,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/247/0822-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "259 Ark. 226",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1619263
      ],
      "year": 1976,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/259/0226-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "261 Ark. 790",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1678862
      ],
      "year": 1977,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/261/0790-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "252 Ark. 1077",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1629940
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1972,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/252/1077-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 185,
    "char_count": 1826,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.679,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.380125665320789e-08,
      "percentile": 0.39169136887903505
    },
    "sha256": "a71f0b2137f0c7315fd300af7baffdb2f635db7fbf33a1e182a524e979f1efdc",
    "simhash": "1:47b8c4541786f136",
    "word_count": 313
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:40:39.197564+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Royce LOVELESS, Sr., Commissioner of the CLARENDON HOUSING AUTHORITY v. CITY OF CLARENDON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM\nThe City Council of Clarendon attempted to end a longstanding dispute between the council and a commissioner of the Housing Authority for the City of Clarendon by removing one of the commissioners. The finding by the city council was taken to the circuit court for review by a writ of certiorari, and the circuit court remanded to the council for additional action. The city reaffirmed its prior action by amendings its findings of fact. The circuit court then approved the action taken by the council.\nMany points are argued on appeal, but we do not reach any of them because we affirm the trial court pursuant to our Rule 9(d). The appellant failed to abstract the charges and findings made against him by the city and also failed to abstract the exhibits. These items should have been abstracted as they were necessary for an understanding of all questions presented to this Court for decision.\nThe appellee could have called appellant\u2019s error to our attention or abstracted the missing items itself. However, this was not done, and we are left with an abstracted record which is insufficient to enable us to understand the case. Reliable Finance Company v. James H. R. Rhodes et al, 252 Ark. 1077, 483 S.W. 2d 187 (1972); Dyke Industries v. Johnson Const. Co., 261 Ark. 790 (1977); Hirrill v. L. R. Civil Service Comm\u2019n., 259 Ark. 226 (1976); Tudor v. Tudor, 247 Ark. 822, 448 S.W. 2d 17 (1969); Davidson v. Messing, 214 Ark. 227, 215 S.W. 2d 138 (1949).\nAffirmed under Rule 9(d).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "E. L. Schieffler, Harvey L. Yates and Raymond Abramson, for appellant.",
      "Moore & Serio, by: Robert G. Serio, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Royce LOVELESS, Sr., Commissioner of the CLARENDON HOUSING AUTHORITY v. CITY OF CLARENDON\n80-182\n606 S.W. 2d 568\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered October 13, 1980\nRehearing denied November 17, 1980\nE. L. Schieffler, Harvey L. Yates and Raymond Abramson, for appellant.\nMoore & Serio, by: Robert G. Serio, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0705-01",
  "first_page_order": 733,
  "last_page_order": 734
}