{
  "id": 1756183,
  "name": "William N. EVANS, Jr. v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Evans v. State",
  "decision_date": "1981-01-26",
  "docket_number": "CR 80-87",
  "first_page": "775",
  "last_page": "776",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "271 Ark. 775"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "610 S.W.2d 577"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "575 S.W. 2d 154",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "264 Ark. 789",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1668834
      ],
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/264/0789-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 58",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1665016
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/265/0058-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 143,
    "char_count": 1432,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.694,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.4716896984601897e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8065931643118962
    },
    "sha256": "7e496b315e33794fd3456a7030449fc8e659d389c8f18c1e933aea08d6778d1e",
    "simhash": "1:94aea4882e62b330",
    "word_count": 253
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:22:30.070289+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William N. EVANS, Jr. v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Darrell Hickman.\nWilliam N. Evans, Jr., was convicted of rape and incest in the Cleburne County Circuit Court.\nOn appeal, his counsel raises only one issue which is that the Supreme Court should order a new trial because defendant was insane at the time of the trial. It is contended that this information was unavailable at trial.\nThe record is void regarding the issue. It contains no reference to the evidence or any request for post judgment relief on the issue. The appellant\u2019s counsel attempts to present the question by a brief to this court. He refers to a letter from a psychiatrist who found, after the trial, that Evans was insane. The letter is not in the record. There is no motion for a new trial.\nApparently an attempt was made to supplement the record but it was denied without prejudice to appellant\u2019s proceeding under Rules of Crim. Proc., Rule 37. Unless evidence is presented to a trial court and is properly in the record we cannot review it. This court does not review any evidence that is not in the record. Weston v. State, 265 Ark. 58, 576 S.W. 2d 705 (1979); Bridger v. State, 264 Ark. 789, 575 S.W. 2d 154 (1979). The judgment must be affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Darrell Hickman."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Dave Wisdom Harrod, J.D., for appellant.",
      "Steve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: Mary Davies Scott, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William N. EVANS, Jr. v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 80-87\n610 S.W. 2d 577\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered January 26, 1981\nDave Wisdom Harrod, J.D., for appellant.\nSteve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: Mary Davies Scott, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0775-01",
  "first_page_order": 821,
  "last_page_order": 822
}