{
  "id": 1174928,
  "name": "Curtis GIBSON v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Gibson v. State",
  "decision_date": "1981-04-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "345",
  "last_page": "345",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "272 Ark. 345"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "614 S.W.2d 234"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "272 Ark. 243",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 956,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.805,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.1850200046748689e-07,
      "percentile": 0.589629163708
    },
    "sha256": "4e18d50ca8826927f33f84bdb9f7822004e062c4d7282f31d6359b71d872cd1b",
    "simhash": "1:37146840ac3fdc21",
    "word_count": 165
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:04.069601+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Curtis GIBSON v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nPetitioner, Curtis Gibson, by his attorneys, James D. Gibson and Robert E. Irwin, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorneys admit that the record was tendered late due to their miscalculation of the seven-month maximum limit for filing the record in this Court. See Rule 5, Ark. R. App. P., Ark. Stat. Ann., Vol. 3A (Repl. 1979).\nWe find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243 (1981).\nA copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "E. Alvin Schay, State Appellate Defender, by: Deborah Davies Cross, Deputy Defender; and Joe Holmes, for petitioner.",
      "Steve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: C. R. McNair, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Curtis GIBSON v. STATE of Arkansas\n614 S.W. 2d 234\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered April 20, 1981\nE. Alvin Schay, State Appellate Defender, by: Deborah Davies Cross, Deputy Defender; and Joe Holmes, for petitioner.\nSteve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: C. R. McNair, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0345-01",
  "first_page_order": 363,
  "last_page_order": 363
}