{
  "id": 8720298,
  "name": "Larry Ellender WILSON v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wilson v. State",
  "decision_date": "1981-07-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "456",
  "last_page": "456",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "273 Ark. 456"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "620 S.W.2d 936"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "609 S.W. 2d 894",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1715240,
        1715311
      ],
      "year": 1980,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/268/0105-01",
        "/ark/268/0191-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "267 Ark. 548",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1719867
      ],
      "year": 1980,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/267/0548-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 89,
    "char_count": 790,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.794,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.4975956836136062e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6645346890880511
    },
    "sha256": "50a69a98524bf78621e62f57bf7bc22bad9fedd5d6ebc5821cc4e0089218b073",
    "simhash": "1:4176a8b8537752a7",
    "word_count": 136
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:17:45.388199+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Larry Ellender WILSON v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe appellant, Larry Ellender Wilson, by his attorney has filed a Motion for Rule on the Clerk. It is denied because the motion does not state good cause. While the attorney for the appellant says there was a misunderstanding between him and the court reporter, there is no acknowledgement that the sole reason the record was not filed was the negligence of the attorney. If the appellant\u2019s attorney will concede that in an amended motion, then the appellant will be granted a belated appeal. See Moore v. State, 267 Ark. 548, 609 S.W. 2d 894 (1980).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Donald H. Smith, for appellant.",
      "Steve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: Alice Ann Bums, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Larry Ellender WILSON v. STATE of Arkansas\n620 S.W. 2d 936\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered July 20, 1981\nDonald H. Smith, for appellant.\nSteve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: Alice Ann Bums, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0456-01",
  "first_page_order": 476,
  "last_page_order": 476
}