{
  "id": 1750185,
  "name": "Donnie BREWER v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Brewer v. State",
  "decision_date": "1982-09-20",
  "docket_number": "CR 82-73",
  "first_page": "40",
  "last_page": "42",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "277 Ark. 40"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "639 S.W.2d 54"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "274 Ark. 126",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1755066
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/274/0126-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "275 Ark. 37",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1753651
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1982,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/275/0037-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "275 Ark. 427",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1753616
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1982,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/275/0427-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "272 Ark. 128",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1174934
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0128-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "271 Ark. 810",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1756184
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/271/0810-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 204,
    "char_count": 2625,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.815,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.256972944853108e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6115223319969619
    },
    "sha256": "49776d3a2703a67d89488710a17ea3711b10bca1e8e8e21c06537dbeed9dac58",
    "simhash": "1:7178aec7e860f3d2",
    "word_count": 433
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:44:10.927944+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Donnie BREWER v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Darrell Hickman, Justice.\nDonnie Brewer was convicted of first degree murder and aggravated robbery and received a thirty year sentence for the murder and fifteen years for the aggravated robbery, to be served consecutively.\nThe only question on appeal is whether the convictions for aggravated robbery and first degree murder violate the prohibition against double jeopardy in Ark. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 41-105 (Repl. 1977). The aggravated robbery in this case was a lesser included offense of first degree murder and Brewer could not be convicted and sentenced for both crimes. Therefore, the conviction for aggravated robbery is set aside.\nBrewer was one of three men charged with the robbery of the combination grocery store and post office in Charlotte, Arkansas on December 14, 1978, and the death of Morris Lillard in connection with that robbery. David Weaver, one of the defendants, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to twenty-four years in prison. He testified against Brewer and according to his testimony Brewer fired the weapon that killed Mr. Lillard. Ronnie Brewer, the appellant\u2019s brother, was convicted of robbery but acquitted of murder. See Brewer v. State, 271 Ark. 810, 611 S.W.2d 179 (1981).\nThe only question concerned in this appeal involves the issue of double jeopardy. Ark. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 41-105 (Repl. 1977) provides:\n(1) When the same conduct of a defendant may establish the commission of more than one offense, the defendant may be prosecuted for each such offense. He may not, however, be convicted of more than one offense if:\n(a) one offense is included in the other as defined in subsection (2);. . .\n(2). . . An offense is so included if:\n(a) it is established by proof of the same or less than all of the elements required to establish the commission of the offense charged; . . .\nThere is no doubt in this case that the conviction and sentence of Brewer for the second offense violated this provision of Arkansas law. See Swaite v. State, 272 Ark. 128, 612 S.W.2d 307 (1981); and Foster v. State, 275 Ark. 427, 631 S.W.2d 7 (1982). Therefore, the conviction and sentence for aggravated robbery are set aside. The conviction and sentence for first degree murder are affirmed. Rowe v. State, 275 Ark. 37, 627 S.W.2d 16 (1982); Singleton v. State, 274 Ark. 126, 623 S.W.2d 180 (1981).\nAffirmed as modified.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Darrell Hickman, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Highsmith, Gregg, Hart \u00e9r Farris, by: Phillip Farris and Josephine L. Hart, for appellant.",
      "Steve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: Matthew Wood Fleming, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Donnie BREWER v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 82-73\n639 S.W.2d 54\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered September 20, 1982\nHighsmith, Gregg, Hart \u00e9r Farris, by: Phillip Farris and Josephine L. Hart, for appellant.\nSteve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: Matthew Wood Fleming, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0040-01",
  "first_page_order": 60,
  "last_page_order": 62
}